Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
The only reason for this totally factualless assumption by atheist/evolutionists is that the theory of evolution requires it.

Ooops. Another false statement. Sorry, but there were so many I overlooked this one. No, this theory is not "required" by evolution. How the heck do you figure that? The endosymbiotic theory is of fairly recent origin. Off the top of my head I believe it was first suggested (but never tested or developed into an actual theory) in the mid-20's or thereabouts. It was only developed as a serious theory in the last twenty years (if IIRC), and generally accepted even more recently.

The mitochondria and cholorplasts developed from symbiots is only the way (apparently) that it happened to work out. There is nothing in the theory of evolution that requires that it happened this way. Similar organelles might have been evolved within the cell, or their functions might have evolved in some other way. After all bacteria evolved them in the first place.

42 posted on 10/18/2003 8:57:28 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Stultis
I think the simple answer is that the evolution and development of the mitochondria preceeded the evolution of the cell wall.
43 posted on 10/18/2003 9:20:48 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson