LOL. Sorry, I'm just reporting the news. Yes, it's time to shoot this messenger, since you don't like my message. If I tell you something that casts doubt about the credibility of the prosecution's case that is somehow "attacking the victim". No, Michael Jackson doesn't need me to do anything on his behalf, nor have I any interest to. ONCE AGAIN, Kobe does not have a history of sexually assaulting people, while Jackson and Clinton do. Can you see the difference yet? Can you? Just concentrate really hard and it'll eventually come to you.
In the meantime, how about we stick to the subject of Kobe Bryant? Is your attack on him so weak and pathetic that you have to bring in Michael Jackson and Bill Clinton to strengthen your "case"? I don't know what happened in that room AND NEITHER DO YOU. You said the case should be based solely on the testimony of witnesses, not about the "victim's" credibility. WELL, WHAT DO YOU SAY WHEN THE SUPPOSED VICTIM IS HAVING SEX WITH THE KEY WITNESS??? HUH??? I suppose it would also be OK if she's having sex with the judge and all the jurors, too, right?