When was the last time this happened ?
1 posted on
10/16/2003 11:06:01 AM PDT by
Truth666
To: Truth666
Wasn't it right after 9/11?
To: Truth666
It looks like the end of NATO is finally here.
3 posted on
10/16/2003 11:08:46 AM PDT by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: Truth666
Should we hit the showers???
To: Truth666
US calls Nato meeting on EU defence
By Judy Dempsey in Brussels
Published: October 16 2003 18:20 | Last Updated: October 16 2003 18:20
The US has called an emergency Nato meeting to challenge the creation of a stronger security and defence policy for the European Union.
The call by Nicholas Burns, US ambassador to Nato, reflects growing unease among Pentagon officials over the way Britain wants to work more closely with its EU allies in building credible defence structures and better military capabilities. But it also highlights tensions in the transatlantic alliance, with the US seeing any future EU defence policy as a potential competitor to Nato.
The US move came as EU leaders met last night to discuss how to make European defence more effective in any new constitutional treaty. The draft treaty is being negotiated in the intergovernment conference that includes the 15 current member and 10 candidate states that join next year.
British, French and German officials on Thursday said it was too early to make any decisions over defence issues. "This is only the beginning. We need a more coherent defence policy that will complement Nato," said one British official.
Nevertheless, the Pentagon and the White House are particularly concerned over how Tony Blair, UK prime minister, wants to co-operate over defence with Germany and France, which opposed the US-led attack on Iraq.
"Somehow the US believes that because Britain is considered its staunchest ally, it cannot work with its EU allies," said one European ambassador. "This is ridiculous. If Blair is involved in Europe it means the transatlantic relationship is protected," he added.
Last month, Mr Blair held a summit in Berlin with French President Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schröder of Germany. They agreed on "structured co-operation" in which a group of countries would take the lead in improving Europe's military capabilities.
France and Germany quietly dropped the idea of creating an independent military headquarters in Tervuren, near Brussels, something the US and Britain believed was a direct challenge to Nato. However, Mr Blair conceded that the EU did need operation planning headquarters if it was to carry out missions independent of Nato.
Mr Burns, a former US ambassador to Greece and State Department spokesman, lambasted such plans at Wednesday's regular meeting of Nato ambassadors. He said EU defence plans represented "one of the greatest dangers to the transatlantic relationship". He insisted Nato should know what kind of defence policies would be contained in the new treaty.
Benoit D'Aboville, French ambassador to Nato, told Mr Burns Nato had no business knowing about internal matters of the EU until they were agreed by its members.
An EU diplomat said the US believed France was setting a hidden agenda. "It believes Paris will use the trio to gradually strengthen the EU's military capabilities and eventually move away from Nato."
British officials, who on Thursday played down the US criticisms, said a Europe with better military capabilities and with Britain involved would lead to greater burden-sharing, especially in the Balkans.
7 posted on
10/16/2003 11:10:44 AM PDT by
RobFromGa
(Sen. Joe McCarthy helped win our death-match against the USSR- Pass it on!)
To: Truth666
Why didn't you post the entire title?
9 posted on
10/16/2003 11:11:44 AM PDT by
EggsAckley
(..........................God Bless and Keep Terri.....................)
To: Truth666
Has France surrendered yet?
11 posted on
10/16/2003 11:13:25 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Truth666
This is pure Liberal Media Crap published merely to cast doubt upon the Presidency of G.W. Bush. I work at a NATO facility and dispell any rumor along the lines of a divorce. Europe may be proud, but it literally can't afford to go it alone... especially these days.
12 posted on
10/16/2003 11:57:56 AM PDT by
Jumper
To: Truth666
Our message to the EU ought to be: "Defend yourselves, pissants!"
To: Truth666
Mar 15, 12:49 PM EST
EU Calls Emergency Meetings on Terrorism
By CONSTANT BRAND
Associated Press Writer
BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) -- The European Union will hold high-level security talks on Friday to assess what additional anti-terrorism measures to take in the wake of the bombings in Madrid, the Irish prime minister announced Monday.
Prime Minister Bertie Ahern said proposals would include a "solidarity clause" committing nations to help each other in response to terror attacks, the appointment of a special EU official to coordinate counterterrorism operations in Europe, improved intelligence sharing and closer cooperation with non-EU nations to combat terrorism at a global level.
"The callous and cowardly attacks on 11 March served as a terrible reminder of the threat posed by terrorism to our society," Ahern said in a statement.
"We condemn utterly those who planted the bombs that wrought such destruction and cost so many lives last Thursday.
"The attacks in Madrid were an attack against the very values on which the Union is founded."
Ireland currently holds the EU's rotating presidency.
EU justice and interior ministers will discuss the proposals Friday.
The EU foreign ministers will continue the debate the following Monday, before the packages goes to an EU summit, scheduled for March 25-26. All the meetings will be at EU headquarters in Brussels.
Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
17 posted on
03/15/2004 10:31:09 AM PST by
kahoutek
((A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson