To: Protagoras
I couldn't possibly look foolish because I haven't dismissed anything as a possibility. I haven't even dismissed the National Enquirer version as a possibility other than Rush has stated that it contains distortions.
However, you have placed your reputation behind the National Enquirer. You've already got Rush in jail without due process. You've decided that Rush is guilty until proven innocent. You're even trying to repeat a lie that Rush Limbaugh has stated which prescription medication that he's addicted to and the lie that he's stated how much he's taken.
But now that you've chosen to insult me, I'm going to make you look foolish. I'm going to call you on your bluff.
Please provide the source (or a link) where Rush Limbaugh himself has stated which SPECIFIC prescription medication he is addicted to. Also provide a source where Rush Limbaugh himself states how much of it he consumed and/or purchased.
My third grade eyes await for enlightlenment from the great Protagoras
551 posted on
10/17/2003 7:43:19 AM PDT by
kidd
To: kidd
However, you have placed your reputation behind the National Enquirer. It is very close to crossing over from a lame attempt to mislead to an outright lie.
552 posted on
10/17/2003 7:45:41 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
To: kidd
You're even trying to repeat a lie that Rush Limbaugh has stated which prescription medication that he's addicted to and the lie that he's stated how much he's taken. That is an outright lie. From now on, if you are going to address something you claim I said, post the comment in italics or it will safely be assumed you made it up.
553 posted on
10/17/2003 7:48:09 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson