Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
The seriousness of the offense will be related to the specific drug that Rush is addicted to. It will also be related to the specific amount he had in his posession. Also the exact drug and the exact quantity will help to form an implication of how he obtained it.

So, before you continue insulting Freepers about how Rush obtained his drugs, you need to provide a non-insulting source of information that provides SPECIFICS.

Implications are fine. But if your source of information is unreliable, then insulting other Freepers for not accepting your unreliable implication is unwarranted.
189 posted on 10/16/2003 1:29:32 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
As far as I'm concerned there was no offence whatsoever, except hypocricy.

But just for fun, how do YOU think he obtained his drugs? He admits he is an addict. He got it somehwere.

Oh yeah, you will wait and see until the proof is in. I forgot. LOL

199 posted on 10/16/2003 1:39:06 PM PDT by Protagoras (Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson