Neither - Just that it is premature to claim a double standard in his case, when we don't even know if a case exists. Did he break the law? He says he did. Does that automatically mean he will be charged? Not unless the state has compelling evidence that he has broken the law.
They don't just up and charge someone because they read a story in the Enquirer. Once the story broke, I assume that any physical evidence was long gone, so searching his house probably would not have resulted in much. Moreover, in this country, you can't get a search warrant based on an Enquirer article - So they would need probable cause. Without both physical evidence and witnesses, they will likely not be able to successfully prosecute a case against him.
But he either did it or he didn't, it has nothing to do with the law. A concept lost on many apologist two face warriors here.