[Blzbba]

"where Christ in the manger is no longer allowed at Christmas Nativity displays"


While I personally have no problems with Nativity scenes, it should be noted that there are no menorrahs, Fat Buddhas, or multi-headed Hindu gods on public display either.

[NutCrackerBoy]

While I personally have no problems with Nativity scenes, it should be noted that there are no menorrahs, Fat Buddhas, or multi-headed Hindu gods on public display either.

The USA has religious freedom for individuals. Period. If anyone has a beef about displaying religious symbols, you and I know the situation would be rectified. So that takes care of multi-headed Hindu gods.

Moving on to the public square, there is no reason other than specious activist Supreme Court doctrine, that symbols of Christianity may not be displayed on public property.

[Gargantua]

"I am the way, and the Truth, and the Life, and none shall come to the Father but through me."

[Gargantua]

"...it should be noted that there are no menorrahs, Fat Buddhas, or multi-headed Hindu gods on public display either."

I think that defines grasping at straws. What place have menorrahs, Buddhas, or Hindu gods at the annual world-wide celebration of the Birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ... also known as Christmas?

Think before you spew, you're embarrassing yourself.