In Their Own Words - (Liberal Democrats Are Two-Faced Liars)

ConservativeAlerts.Com | By Tom Barrett

[webber]

In Their Own Words - (Liberal Democrats Are Two-Faced Liars)

By Tom Barrett

Politicians are funny people. They talk and talk and talk. They love to be heard. But sometimes they forget that people not only listen to what they say, but remember. Today the liberal left is savaging the President and his Administration over going to war with Iraq. They claim that his reasons for going to war were invalid, that there were no weapons of mass destruction, and that Iraq posed no threat to the United States. They are two-faced liars. When Slick Willie was in office, and when they thought it would help their popularity, they told an entirely different story.

---

Let's hear it from their own forked tongues:

---

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
Ex-President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

---

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
Ex-President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

---

"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Feb 18, 1998

---

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

---

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

---

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

---

"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

---

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

---

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

---

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

---

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

---

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

---

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

---

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

---

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

---

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

---

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
Senator John Edwards (D-NC), October 10, 2002

---

"While the distance between the United States and Iraq is great, Saddam Hussein's ability to use his chemical and biological weapons against us is not constrained by geography - it can be accomplished in a number of different ways - which is what makes this threat so real and persuasive."
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), October 10, 2002

---

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

---

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

---

"The essential facts are known. We know of the weapons in Saddam's possession: chemical, biological, and nuclear in time. We know of his unequaled willingness to use them. We know his history. His invasions of his neighbors. His dreams of achieving hegemonic control over the Arab world. His record of anti-American rage. His willingness to terrorize, to slaughter, to suppress his own people and others. We need not stretch to imagine nightmare scenarios in which Saddam makes common cause with the terrorists who want to kill us Americans and destroy our way of life."
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), September 13, 2002

---

"Make no mistake: Saddam Hussein is a ruthless tyrant, and he must give up his weapons of mass destruction. We support the President in the course he has followed so far: working with Congress, working with the United Nations, insisting on strong and unfettered inspections. We must convince the world that Saddam Hussein is not America's problem alone; he is the world's problem. And we urge President Bush to stay this course for we are far stronger when we stand with other nations than when we stand alone."
Governor Gary Locke (D-WA), January 28, 2003

---

Democratic Response to President Bush's "State of the Union" address:

Please note that the quote above was the OFFICIAL RESPONSE of the Democrat Party to Bush's speech; the party line, if you will.

The official position of the Democrats today is that Bush went to war with Iraq so his buddies could make money on the oil! What has changed, guys? Oh, yeah, there's an election coming up! So what you said in January is now lies. Or are you lying today? Hmmm.

It is interesting that several of these quotes are from some of the Dwarfs running for the Democrat nomination, the same Dwarfs who scream out vicious attacks against the President to reporters foolish enough to listen to them. They savage George Bush daily for taking exactly the action they called for.

Potential Dwarf Hillary's current hobby includes making the same kind of attacks on Bush for taking action against Iraq. She has stated in several speeches that there is no justification for the war, that there were never any biological weapons, and that there is no connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. She obviously believes that we are too stupid to dig up her prior statements that are precisely opposite of her current stance. And of course she can depend on her buddies in the liberal media not to bring up such embarrassing discrepancies.

Former Dwarf Al Gore's comments are particularly amusing. "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." And, "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."You're sure singing a different tune today, Al. What changed?

This is business as usual for the left. When "Bubba Clinton" rattled his saber in Saddam's direction (but did nothing), they all cheered and agreed with him. When patriotic fervor was high they all jumped on the bandwagon and tried to capitalize on it by agreeing with the President loudly. Now that we are in the tough phase of the operation and some Americans are having doubts about Iraq, these traitors try to make us believe they were against it in the first place.

They really are pitiful.

---

NUMEROUS INTERNET LINKS VERIFYING THE ACCURACY OF THE QUOTES:

---

QUOTE 1 -- QUOTE 2 -- QUOTE 3 -- QUOTE 4 -- QUOTE 5 -- QUOTE 6 -- QUOTE 7 -- QUOTE 8 -- QUOTE 9 -- QUOTE 10 -- QUOTE 11 -- QUOTE 12 -- QUOTE 13 -- QUOTE 14 -- QUOTE 15

---

[Smogger]

wow! well let me just bookmark this! and save a local copy ;-)

[concerned about politics]

Washington Post. Clintons State of the Union Address
1998 State Of The Union Address
January 27, 1998

Federal News Service

Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them.

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them.

The United Nations weapons inspectors have done a truly remarkable job, finding and destroying more of Iraq's arsenal than was destroyed during the entire gulf war. Now, Saddam Hussein wants to stop them from completing their mission.

I know I speak for everyone in this chamber, Republicans and Democrats, when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world," and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again."

[MJY1288]

Great Job, Bumped and bookmarmed

[concerned about politics]

Book marked for reference!!!!
Good post!!!

[concerned about politics]

Bump
BTTT

[Quix]

THANKS MUCH.

VERY USEFUL.

[concerned about politics]

BUMPity

[america-rules]

Imagine all the GOP TV ads running in Sept 2004 showing all these people saying these things. Or, when Dean or Hillbilly says in the first Pres debate we were lied to by Bush on Iraq Bush only needs to pull out a card and use the above quotes for his answer.

[steplock]

Ka-Ping

[smoothsailing]

Good Work.

May I forward this along to pals and local news outlets?

Again, good work, you drew statements together that need to be seen as the truth they represent.

The 180 of these blowing in the wind utterers must be exposed.

[ladyinred]

These are terrific!
If only the liberal socialist media would talk about this! You know they would were it the other way around!

[concerned about politics]

Imagine all the GOP TV ads running in Sept 2004 showing all these people saying these things.

The GOP had better use this stuff!

[jonno]

Wow! WMD bump

[webber]

You may forward this article to anybody you please. The more people that know about the hipocrisy of the demonrat party the better.

FORWARD MARCH!

[webber]

"The GOP had better use this stuff".

They won't be ignorant of it's existence; I emailed this article to GOP members of Both Houses of Congress.