Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Absentee voting stirs debate (Tony Rand makes it harder for Military to vote absentee in NC)
News & Observer ^ | October 15, 2003 | JOHN ZEBROWSKI

Posted on 10/15/2003 6:17:14 PM PDT by jern

Absentee voting stirs debate Some blame politics for a change that makes getting a ballot harder

By JOHN ZEBROWSKI, Staff Writer

Rep. Martin Nesbitt, a Buncombe Democrat, said he didn't know who did it. Across the political aisle, Rep. Paul Stam, a Wake Republican, said he had no idea how the change made it into an unrelated bill on the last day of the 2002 General Assembly. Same for the State Board of Elections, the Republican Party and local elections officials. The quasi-mystery was: Who inserted language into the Technical Corrections Bill -- a thick slab of legislation used to clean up mistakes in the state budget -- that makes it more difficult for people to obtain an absentee ballot for all North Carolina elections, including the one Nov. 4?

This wasn't an amendment, so there was no sponsor. People had hunches that it came from a Democrat in the Senate; they just didn't want to be the ones to say it.

"I wish someone would get to the bottom of this," Nesbitt said .

Here's the bottom: Sen. Tony Rand, the powerful Fayetteville Democrat, added the few lines to the bill while it was still in committee. Rand is not denying his role . He said the changes were necessary to fix a system that was being abused. Others, though, insist the move was pure politics, another skirmish in an escalating contest between the two major parties to control voter turnout.

"It's as simple as the fact [that] more Republicans send in absentee ballots than Democrats," said Cherie Poucher , Wake's elections director.

Absentee voting is no longer just for the absent. The deadline to apply for a ballot for the Nov. 4 election is Oct. 28 , with all absentee ballots due at the Board of Elections the day before the vote. Early voting at the Board of Elections begins Thursday.

For the past four years, the legislature has been making it easier for people to vote absentee, striking the provisions that a voter needed a reason to apply, such as illness or travel. Easing the rules for mail-in voting is one of the major trends in U.S. voting, seen as a way to limit costs and increase turnout.

Last year, someone could download a form from the election board's Web site or fill out a photocopy of a form and mail it in. A ballot was sent almost immediately.

This year, though, the Internet forms have been removed; photocopies of a request aren't allowed. Now the voter must contact the board directly for a form or mail a request "written entirely by the requester personally" or by a family member and then signed by the voter.

As Poucher puts it, voters now must request a request -- a change that provoked a couple of dozen complaints for last week's election. She expects the angry letters to roll in for next year's general election, when most voters will discover the changes.

When "no excuse" absentee voting was instituted for the 2000 general election, the Republican Party aggressively moved to take advantage of the changes. Bill Peaslee , the state GOP political director, said information on how to obtain a ballot was integrated into campaigns. In Wake, Poucher said, Republicans sent absentee applications to party members containing the voter's name, address, date of birth and registration number -- all that was needed was a signature and a trip to the mailbox.

The efforts worked. Poucher said Republicans have been pulling away from Democrats in Wake in the number of absentee ballots cast through the mail. Statewide, the two parties were even for the 2000 general election. But last year, the percentage of registered Republicans voting absentee surpassed the percentage of Democrats.

When the legislature liberalized the absentee law, it was Republicans who tried to block it, arguing that it could be subject to fraud. "We fought it, and it turned out to be a bonanza for us," Rep. Joe Kiser, a Lincoln County Republican, told North Carolina Insight magazine this spring.

That bonanza, Rand said, comes at a price. The absentee ballot, he said, is not something political parties should be encouraging people to use. Rand said he is a supporter of the one-stop voting sites where people can fill out a ballot up to three weeks before the election. But even though absentee voting is now "no excuse," he said, it really should be used only by those who know they won't be able to make it to the polls.

"We've made it about as simple as the voting process should be," he said. "We don't want anybody soliciting people to vote absentee. It violates the spirit of the law, in my humble opinion."

Rand dismissed criticism by Republicans such as Stam as nothing but politics: "A hit dog always hollers."

Michael McLaughlin , editor of North Carolina Insight, which is published by the N.C. Center for Public Policy Research, said Rand's argument that soliciting absentee voters is wrong doesn't make sense. "What's different about that than soliciting people to go to the polls on Election Day?" he asked.

Nesbitt, the Buncombe representative, plans to fight to get the changes repealed. He said he will introduce legislation to repeal the restrictions. An earlier attempt, passed by a huge margin in the House, stalled in the Senate.

If another bill makes it to the Senate, Rand said, he will fight to make sure it's defeated.

Ferrel Guillory , director of the P rogram on Southern Politics, Media and Public Life at UNC-Chapel Hill, said the battle over the mechanics of absentee ballots is part of a greater fight over voter turnout between the two major parties. The 1980s and 1990s, he said, were dominated by an "air war," with the emphasis on attack ads on television and radio.

But the rise of Republicanism in the South has brought the two major parties to near-parity in North Carolina, with the Democrats holding on to a slight edge in voter registration. This, Guillory said, combined with the state's low voter turnout, triggered massive drives to get people, particularly loyalists, to actually cast their ballots. Absentee voting was seen as one more way to achieve this.

"Just over the last four [to] six years, the competition has really increased over voter turnout," he said. "It's the ground war now where elections are won."

Staff Writer John Zebrowski can be reached at 829-4841 or jzebrows@newsobserver.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 30th; 82nd; militaryvote; nationalguard; northcarolina; oldnorthstate; tonyrand; unhelpful

1 posted on 10/15/2003 6:17:15 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; Howlin; mykdsmom

Democratic corruption ping
2 posted on 10/15/2003 6:19:07 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Just remember 30th Brigade (NCNG's largest component) and parts of the 82nd are going to be gone next year. Maybe not for the general election, but probably for the primaries
3 posted on 10/15/2003 6:27:30 PM PDT by 91B (Golly it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern; Constitution Day
Who inserted language into the Technical Corrections Bill -- a thick slab of legislation used to clean up mistakes in the state budget

For those outside of NC, and in NC for that matter who do not know. The Technical Corrections Bill is an annual bill that makes "Technical Corrections". Meaning, it corrects misspellings, improper punctuation, and grammatical errors in the budget. That is what it is supposed to do, but the past couple of years the RATS have snuck things into it without anyones knowledge.

I don't remember what they added last year, but it caused a big stir when it was discovered. I am hoping Constitution Day or another FReeper will remember what it was.

4 posted on 10/15/2003 6:27:31 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Pinger dinger.
5 posted on 10/15/2003 6:33:56 PM PDT by upchuck (This Tag Line be blank on porpoise :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I don't think anyone new about it until the next election. You would have to think that someone would have some dirt somewhere on Rand, now would be the time to dig it up.
6 posted on 10/15/2003 6:37:25 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jern
I guess it's just beyond the realm of the possible to expect politicians to actually examine the bills they vote for.
7 posted on 10/15/2003 6:54:38 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jess35
"I guess it's just beyond the realm of the possible to expect politicians to actually examine the bills they vote for. "

Of course they do,,, six months to a year after they vote on them.

8 posted on 10/15/2003 7:13:28 PM PDT by TYVets ("An armed society is a polite society." - Robert A. Heinlien & me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jern
"A hit dog always hollers". Added to repertoire. Thanks for the post.
9 posted on 10/15/2003 7:17:48 PM PDT by kcar (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Old_North_State; **North_Carolina; Constitution Day; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ...
NC Ping!
10 posted on 10/15/2003 7:29:27 PM PDT by mykdsmom (We often give our enemies the means of our own destruction - Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcar
I was thinking when I read it that it would make a good tagline.....hhhmmmm, I think it's time for a change.

MKM

11 posted on 10/15/2003 7:31:04 PM PDT by mykdsmom (We often give our enemies the means of our own destruction - Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jern
People had hunches that it came from a Democrat in the Senate; they just didn't want to be the ones to say it.

Why the hell not?

12 posted on 10/15/2003 7:48:27 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jern
Earlier this tear, NC Democrats proposed the idea of allowing people to register to vote on election day. They claimed increasing voter turnout is beneficial for NC. Yet, Tarheel RATS are making it difficult for our soldiers to vote. Bottom line: Never trust a RAT to be intellectually honest about anything.
13 posted on 10/15/2003 8:56:55 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
***He(Rand)said the changes were necessary to fix a system that was being abused***

If Rand is really about curbing election abuses, he would not object to voters presenting ID at the polls and support repealing the NC law that grants driver's licenses to illegals. Interesting to note, where's Je$$e crying voter disenfranchisement?
14 posted on 10/15/2003 9:05:20 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern; billbears
One note: ALWAYS READ A CONTRACT BEFORE SIGNING IT.

The consequences can be somewhat embarassing.
15 posted on 10/16/2003 3:42:28 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom; Constitution Day
.....thanks mykidsmom.......I expect that liberal Democrats are behind this......the military community in my area [both active and retired] is staunchly conservative.
16 posted on 10/17/2003 9:23:10 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
The problem is stupid congressmen who refuse to read the entire bill and who will not make use of their volunteer constituents to read them either.
17 posted on 10/17/2003 12:59:06 PM PDT by TaxRelief (In every coating of armor, a chink eventually appears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jern
I want to thank you for posting this to FreeRepublic. It was great to see Fat Tony get ANY bad press, for there is no Democrat state Senator who deserves it more.

Time after time, Fat Tony has shut down debate and used parliamentary shell games to sucessfully shield Democrats from up or down recorded votes on tax and spend alternatives and many other sound ideas offered in good faith. He essentially wrote the present Senate Rules, so using the term "parliamentary manuvers" is an insult to honest deliberative assembly and the role of legislatures in constitutional republics.

The Capital Press Corp just ignores this over and over again.

Again, thanks for putting it up here.

18 posted on 10/18/2003 5:34:11 AM PDT by Prospero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson