Replies

Yeah, I was actually quite suprised to see it so lopsided in favor of killing her. All I can think is that the article is so slanted that people see it as an act of mercy than what it really is---murder.

"All I can think is that the article is so slanted that people see it as an act of mercy than what it really is---murder."

I was surprised too, but unless it is dedicated voting by the pro-euthanasia crowd, this is very disheartening.

This whole incident convinces me I should have a "living will" which will basically say keep my alive as long as possible, and whoever doesn't like that, too bad.

They are going to start killing people off here, just like they are doing in Holland.

It is very hard to think we are not in the end times, so much that is plainly wrong is held up a right. It is hard to comprehend that 70% of the American public are would-be heartless killing cravers.

Well Skooz, wait until it is their turn to have the plug pulled on them and then see how they vote.

Michael states " Teri would not want to live like this."

If that is true, then why did he keep her "like this" until he won his lawsuit and deposited the money in the bank.

If you will check back, it was only after he got the money that, "Teeri would not want to live like this."