Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HIV/Aids: Catholic Church in Condom Palaver
AllAfrica ^ | Chioma Obinna

Posted on 10/14/2003 7:33:33 PM PDT by narses

The Catholic Church has been accused of warning people in African, Asian and other countries with high rates of HIV infection that condoms do not protect against the transmission of the virus, the claims come just a day after a report revealed that a young person is now infected with HIV every 14 seconds.

According to BBC report, "cardinals, bishops, priests and nuns in four continents of the church have been quoted as saying HIV can pass through tiny holes in condoms but latest warnings were made in a Panorama programme called 'Sex and the Holy City' by one of the Vatican's most senior cardinals Alfonso Lopez Trujillo who allegedly suggests that the AIDS virus is roughly 450 times smaller than the spermatozoon and could pass through net formed by the condom.

Trujillo, President of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for the Family, called on governments to urge people not to use condoms.

His words "These margins of uncertainty, should represent an obligation on the part of the health ministries and all these campaigns to act in the same way as they do, with regard to cigarettes, which they state to be a danger."

In swift reaction to this claim, the World Health Organization (WHO) has condemned the comments and warned the Vatican to desist from putting lives at risk with such utterances.

A spokeswoman to WHO was quoted as saying that" Statements like this are quite dangerous"We are facing a global pandemic which has already killed more than 20 million people and currently affects around 42 million. "There is so much evidence to show that condoms don't let sexually transmitted infections like HIV through. "Anyone who says otherwise is just wrong."

Also reacting, Catherine Hankins, Chief Scientific Advisor to UNAIDS,, argued that the statements by Catholic Church are totally incorrect saying that Latex condoms are impermeable. She added that latex condoms are not only good but can perfectly prevent HIV transmission from one person to another during sex.

According to her, " "It is very unfortunate to have this type of misinformation being broadcast, "It is a concern. From a technical point of view, the statements are totally incorrect. "Latex condoms are impermeable. They do prevent HIV transmission."

Meanwhile, several anti - AIDS campaigns have also condemned the call by the Vatican arguing that condoms are straightforward and effective way of preventing HIV transmission and to suggest otherwise is dangerous.

However, the claim by the Catholic Church is already having effect on the condom distribution activities of some anti HIV/AIDS programmes.

Efforts to get a reaction from Catholic Secretariat in Lagos were unsuccessful as at press time.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cafeteriacatholics; catholicchurch; catholiclist; hiv; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-230 next last
To: Jeff Chandler
Cure for AIDS: Abstinence
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/979502/posts
61 posted on 10/14/2003 10:03:02 PM PDT by Coleus (Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narses
In the instance of communicable disease, public health officials usually try to contain and stop the spread of a disease, not enable behavior which creates a possibility of transmission. We've also quarantined people for lesser diseases.

The entire AIDS epidemic has been conducted unlike any other communicable disease. It's also been a complete failure. If someone in your family had tuberculosis, I guarantee you that everyone would not be instructed to continue kissing/sharing utensils, etc, because it's politically incorrect to ask otherwise.
62 posted on 10/14/2003 10:10:39 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
You have just confirmed my statement above that you would rather have people die a horrible death from AIDS than commit the "mortal sin" of using a condom.

No, narses and I would rather have them lead moral lives. Then they don't need to die a horrible death from AIDS, and they don't need to use a condom, either.

It's really rather simple, if you're talking about someone using a condom to fornicate, adulterate, or commit sodomy. You see, those acts are crimes against God's law. Not our law: God's law. So, telling people to use a condom to commit sin ("but do it safely!") is exactly like advising a robber, "rob if you must, but wear body armor, so you can do it safely".

Do you plan on taking up a collection to equip robbers with body armor? I thought not.

Now, if we're talking about married couples where one partner has the HIV virus, they should be continent. If, that is, they really love one another. If they don't really love one another but are only using one another for sexual release, then they really should remain continent. Don't tell me it's impossible. Human beings are more than a pair of gonads attached to a checking account, no matter what our society tells you.

BTW, I know plenty of Catholics, and I am happy to say none of them are morally twisted like you.

Narses isn't morally twisted, he/she is morally sane. And the "Catholics" you know are CINOs.

You see, Catholicism, rightly understood (and many who claim to speak for the Church don't rightly understand it, I freely admit), isn't about compromising with the world. It's about turning sinful people into Sons and Daughters of God. And every Catholic on earth is supposed to be willing to submit to "a horrible death" -- martyrdom -- rather than abandon their faith. Every single one. (Incidentally, there are no non-horrible deaths, so your adjective is redundant.) Sorry if that's a little too meaty for you to handle right now. Read some C.S Lewis and Peter Kreeft to discover what real sanity is all about.

63 posted on 10/14/2003 10:14:12 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: narses
LOL, you concede the Uganda data and then claim (absent any supporting facts) that condoms are the reason.

You haven't presented

any evidence

for your claims that abstinence/fidelty education have been solely responsible for the decline. All you've really done is cherry-pick anecdotes that support your position. That's intellectually dishonest.

I'm pointing out that the decline has been widely attributed to a combination of abstinence and condom availability/use.

It's not controversial, or even disputed: you educate the people you can educate about abstinence and fidelity, and those who won't listen, you attempt to help via other means.

What motivates your obfuscation? Is it bigotry?

As a matter of fact, there, Arses, I'm Catholic. So, no.

Now, what motivates your dissembling?

Snidely

64 posted on 10/14/2003 10:21:15 PM PDT by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
If my wife had AIDS I wouldn't have sex with her. And if I had AIDS, I for sure wouldn't have sex with her, rubber or not. You must be nuts.

And yet, from what I understand, married couples where one partner is HIV positive can and do have sex w/ condoms without the other partner contracting the virus.

Putting that aside, it seems to me that even after educating, especially in a predominantly rural, relatively backward culture like that of Uganda, you're still gonna have people who refuse to listen. So, what to do with them? Just let them run around and infect people?

With HIV and other STDs, there's an intersection (and conflict) between some folks' morality and the very large, very real public health issues involved. Those who take a moral stance need to be aware of that. Unfortunately, I fear that they are, but just don't care.

Snidely

65 posted on 10/14/2003 10:28:25 PM PDT by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
I think my position is much more morally defensible than yours.

Well,in a world where everything is relative what does it matter? I believe in absolutes and I think in the big picture my position is morally superior to yours.

You will find,in your world of relative truths,there may come a time when you,or your children, will have no freedom,because a group more powerful will take command and establish new rights and wrongs goods and bads.

Today you are comfortable with the prevailing values because they work for you,tomorrow another group may decide that the world could be better if only healthy,bright,good looking people could have sex with others.You or your children may not meet those standards.They could decide that anyone without permission to have sex would be forced to have an abortion and if they managed to conceal the pregnancy than the child would be killed at birth or when discovered.And,the disobedient life giver and bearer might be thrown in jail.

In order for the world to work people need to look at the long term consequences of the causes they espouse and the choices they make.To endorse or espoouse relative values and truths is a precarious path to travel.

There can be no freedom absent truth,the Cardinal made a true statement about condoms not being effective in preventing AIDS,the Catholic Church states unequivocably that abstinence is the sure fire AIDS preventative. It is a sin and immoral to twist or suppress those facts.

66 posted on 10/14/2003 10:33:16 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: narses; Unam Sanctam; Palladin; ABrit; Intolerant in NJ; cookcounty; Reagan79; walden; ...
Kudos for your defense of Truth and Reason.

Why should the Catholic Church be expected to either encourage any form of promiscuous sex outside of marriage, or the violation of the sacrament within marriage?

67 posted on 10/14/2003 10:34:55 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Safe sex isn't. And you cannot put a condom over your soul, assuming you still have one.
68 posted on 10/14/2003 10:41:41 PM PDT by Thorondir (iSLAM is a disease begging for a cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Campion; narses; All
BTT

C.S Lewis and Peter Kreeft extra BUMP!
69 posted on 10/14/2003 10:45:53 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
You will find,in your world of relative truths,there may come a time when you,or your children, will have no freedom,because a group more powerful will take command and establish new rights and wrongs goods and bads.

That's already happened. The Catholic Church did exactly that during a period known as the Dark Ages. You're the one trying to control people's sexuality, not me. I'm not the one who believes condoms are going to bring about the Apocalypse

70 posted on 10/14/2003 10:47:58 PM PDT by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Thorondir
I'm soulless because I don't want people to die from AIDS?
You're the one who values the Church's ignorant and backward birth control policy above people's lives
As I asked above, please cite the chapter and verse of the Bible in which condom use is prohibited
71 posted on 10/14/2003 11:07:09 PM PDT by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: narses
Condoms were between 49% and 100% effective in preventing the spread of gonorrhea in men, but no effect was found for women. And an array of other serious diseases — chlamydia, chancroid, trichomoniasis, syphilis and genital herpes — showed no reduction with condom use. These diseases also increase the risk of contracting HIV.

That's correct. It's also worth pointing out condoms aren't intended to prevent those diseases, but instead diseases such as the aforementioned gonorrhea. The prevention of many other diseases, such as syphilis or herpes, is of uncertain benefit. There have been studies that have found a reduction in risk, while others have not found significant benefit. So, it's dishonest spinning to state that there's absolutely no benefit to be had.

Human papillomavirus, or HPV, is the cause of more than 90% of all cases of cervical cancer, which kills more American women each year than AIDS.

Perspective: According to the American Cancer Society, about 4000 women died last year from cervical cancer (which, I might add, could be cut about in half by every woman getting a Pap smear regularly). AIDS deaths last year among US women were 3800 (CDC). Not a big difference, statistically.

Incidentally, about 90% of HPV infections clear themselves on their own. Some of the articles I've seen suggest that hands may be one of the major transmission vectors. So, wear a surgical glove, I guess.

Snidely

72 posted on 10/14/2003 11:24:14 PM PDT by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
See the thing is, telling me things like that is useless. I'm married. I have sex only with my husband BUT WE STILL USE CONDOMS.

Honeygrl, the kind of sex that these people practice is, forgive me, ANAL. The only kind of sex that is known to transmit the HIV virus. Yes, it's a fact. If international health organizations keep pushing birth control over HIV prevention, the death and suffering will be on souls of the countries and their elites who pushed the deadly lie anal sex with multiple partners is okay as long as condoms are worn. Don't take this the wrong way, but for a pressured, young mom you have a lot of spare time to ignore the vital information that is being offered to you here. Get some rest.

73 posted on 10/14/2003 11:36:48 PM PDT by Havisham (tag lines: a bad idea whose time has past)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
except for that fifteen percent of the time they fail outright by breaking, slipping off, etc

My husband and I used condoms (well, technically, it was he who used the condom) for many years, and never once did any of these occur. We also used a diaphragm (well, technically, it was I who used the diaphragm). There were health reasons why I couldn't use birth control pills. But I did use the Billings method to keep track of fertility, and we either abstained during fertility or used a barrier method of contraception. And then no contraception (and there was much rejoicing) during non-fertile periods. Nor did we ever experience an unplanned pregnancy. Both of our sons were conceived as planned.

74 posted on 10/15/2003 1:22:04 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
The truth is that condoms prevent AIDS most of the time, almost all of the time. An honest health care provider would tell his/her patient this truth, and let him/her make intelligent informed decisions.

God gave us our reason and our ingenuity and it would be a sin against the Holy Spirit not to use them.


75 posted on 10/15/2003 1:24:56 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All; WackyKat
Do a find in forum, my friends. This unhappy disruptor is a troll, plain and simple.
76 posted on 10/15/2003 1:25:48 AM PDT by Thorondir (iSLAM is a disease begging for a cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: narses
bttt
77 posted on 10/15/2003 1:47:40 AM PDT by Peelod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snidely Whiplash; narses; WackyKat; Canticle_of_Deborah; Campion; Thorondir; Unam Sanctam
You know, I just wandered on to this thread. The subject came up for me in the late '80's because our niece living with us got AIDS and died way back then. Studies were already out then and had nothing to do with your assault on either decent Catholics or the Church.

It was just a no-brainer back then. A surgeon very early on learned the hard way that condoms and surgical gloves were no more protection against AIDS virus than a basketball hoop could stop a marble. It was so obvious to all that only the most blindly politically correct and those most in denial could still deny. That was in 1988. No question of morality, just of brains.

Put simply a water molecule is huge compared to a virus and is too big to pass through the pores. That stops water. That is all.

So when you say wear a surgical glove, try asking a surgeon who just isn't ready to die yet. No brainer since 1988.

Now, Snidley, WackyKat, what is your real motive for assaulting decent Catholics? And if you call yourself a Catholic, please give me your definition. It doesn't match anything I know.
78 posted on 10/15/2003 2:44:19 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (I slam Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl; narses
If one commercial jetliner in ten crashed with the loss of all aboard, would you be a tad careful to avoid unnecessary commercial flights wherever possible? If you might fly to your child's graduation from college, would you avoid flying to New York or Los Angeles for a strictly optional shopping trip or opera performance? If your answer to either of these questions is no, perhaps, you can at least understand why many more prudent people are going to reject your advice?
79 posted on 10/15/2003 3:56:08 AM PDT by BlackElk (Don't Western condom-pushers really intend to prevent African babies from being born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Snidely Whiplash; narses; ninenot; sittnick
Snidely, Planneed Barrenhood would attribute declining illiteracy rates, improved weather conditions and decreasing rates of male-pattern baldness to increased condom use. Did your mommy get scared by a Catholic priest when carrying you? Did I read that in an article somewhere, someplace, somehow?

The late Bishop Fulton Sheen said memorably that if the Roman Catholic Church were responsible for half of what it is accused of, he would not have remained be a Catholic either. He did remain a Catholic. No one is drafting you.

Go to your room.

80 posted on 10/15/2003 4:02:19 AM PDT by BlackElk (Don't Western condom-pushers really intend to prevent African babies from being born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson