Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Must SUSTAIN Human Spaceflight (Space Marines to the Rescue!)
Spacedaily.com ^ | 10/13/2003 | Jeff Wright

Posted on 10/13/2003 4:31:58 PM PDT by Reaganesque

Why We Must SUSTAIN Human Spaceflight

by Jeff Wright
Los Angeles - Oct 13, 2003

Very quietly, a bold new vision for space is taking place within the halls of the Pentagon. And the Branch of the service behind this wonderful new development is none other that the United States Marine Corps. Hoo-RAH! To quote a a recent Universal Need Statement (UNS):

"The Marine Corps needs a capability to transport small mission-tailored units thru space from any point on the globe to a contingency at any other point on the globe within minutes...This includes a need for flexibility, such as the ability to loiter in Low Earth Orbit to optimise the time of insertion..."

"The War on Terrorism highlights the need for flexible, rapid response options to contingencies around the world at their earliest stages..."

General Medaris, who once called for troop rockets, would be proud.

The craft would have a negligible sensor cross section, that may be best achieved by boost from heavy-lift. The vehicle must also have kinetic air defense survivability and orbital sustainment, with flexible launch on demand also being a need. The ability to overfly boundaries with little alarm is a must.

On July 30, 2003, Brigadier Richard C. Zilmer gave a statement before the Senate Subcommitte on Science, Technology, and Space, where he gave this quote.

"With regards to the Marine Corp's role in space exploration and manned space flight, we are proud of the historic role we have played in opening up space as a medium of great practical utility. It is notable that The Honorable John Glenn, A Marine, was the first American in space to orbit the Earth...From the arliest days of our involvement, we have made both intellectual and inspirational contributions to the Space Program...and will continue to help define the critical roles that space will play in national security."

On 22 July 2002 Lt. General "Buck" Bedard signed the Small Unit Space Transport and Insetion (SUSTAIN) need statement "blazing a trail to a new expeditionary assault support capability for the next chapter of Marine Corp history."

The following quotes show the seriousness of the Brigadier General:

"The SUSTAIN need relates directly to our Service Advocacy for the reinvigoration of NASA's scientific space exploration activities. While the core missions of the Marine Corp and NASA differ fundamentally, the technology sets they will require to accomplish their respective missions share significant commonalities...there exists a tremendous potential synergy that will mitigate the otherwise prohibitive expense of a solo-DoD technology/capability thrust."

"The Nation can likely only afford one such large, ambitious transformational and/or manned space program at a given time. But that one program can simultaneously serve many customers in commerce, science, and other governmental and civil applications."

"Because our needs lean forward ahead of technology acceleration curve, we desire a NASA that is both energized and unafraid of the space exploration-related science and technology challenges that lie ahead."

Major General Kevin B. Kuklok agrees, and adds, in his March 12, 2003 Statement:

"The benefits of the changes to national security space are clearlt evident, and the space community has already gained considerable unity of effort, authoritative leadership, effective advocacy, and a growing identity...Just as the Army Air Corps eventually outgrew its historical constraints to become the Air Force, we should remain open minded and proactive with regards to space."

General Zilmer ends his statement with the following:

"Whether it is in conjunction with the Air Force Executive Agent for Space or an eventual Space Force or Space Service, the Marine Corp stands ready to work with NASA and others to meet the national security challenges of the 21st Century on land, at sea, in the air, and through space."

Could tomorrows heavy-lift be the ticket to ride for the DropShips of the future? Who can tell.

But rest assured, when the enemy sees the child of SUSTAIN on approach, he will say, (if he even gets the chance)...

"Game over, man!--game over!"



TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: dropship; marines; orbital; space; suborbital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
The bad guys start acting up and the United States Marine Corps drops in from Earth orbit within minutes. Too cool.
1 posted on 10/13/2003 4:31:59 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Have YOU Donated Yet??

PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/13/2003 4:33:52 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
What does Rico say?

3 posted on 10/13/2003 4:39:45 PM PDT by tet68 (multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
And if the LZ's too hot, they say, "Lift off and nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure." (c8
4 posted on 10/13/2003 4:41:22 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Can't see this as practical with current technology.

Reentry is not a very stealthy manuever.

Also, when the shuttle landed at the local airport, the bad guys might get suspicious...

5 posted on 10/13/2003 4:54:23 PM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
What's that Heinlein novel? Starship Troopers?
6 posted on 10/13/2003 4:56:42 PM PDT by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Let's Rock!

7 posted on 10/13/2003 4:59:39 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Imagine the sheer shock and fear of your garden-variety dune-dweller when, on some cloudy night in the not-too-distant-future, an orbital (and, knowing the Marines, highly armed - OOOO-RAH!) drop ship breaches the cloud deck, lands in a stinging blast of thruster-driven sand, drops a ramp, and pukes out several dozen soldiers, armed with weaponry so advanced they may as well come from Alpha Centauri.

God, I wanna see that.
8 posted on 10/13/2003 5:05:12 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
General Medaris, who once called for troop rockets

Starship Troopers

9 posted on 10/13/2003 5:06:37 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Didn't the Marine Corps or Air Force maintain a shuttle at Vandenberg?
10 posted on 10/13/2003 5:39:22 PM PDT by JOE6PAK ("Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils."-Hector Berlioz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
Something like this?

11 posted on 10/13/2003 5:43:30 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
"Because our needs lean forward ahead of technology acceleration curve, we desire a NASA that is both energized and unafraid of the space exploration-related science and technology challenges that lie ahead."

Good Luck. Many of us have been asking this of NASA for decades with no success.

12 posted on 10/13/2003 5:45:26 PM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Or maybe something like this:

http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2yqwp/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/troopers.jpg
13 posted on 10/13/2003 5:50:54 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
She was baaaaaad! My favorite line was:

Q: Hey Vasquez, have you ever been mistaken for a man?
A: No, have you?

14 posted on 10/13/2003 5:53:55 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hc87

15 posted on 10/13/2003 5:55:42 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hc87
A fellow Avalon Hill classicist, I see!

(Also known to SPI fans as "Avalon Swill" :o)
16 posted on 10/13/2003 5:56:27 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
That drop ship should be carrying 2 dozen heavily armed mechs in the 160 - 200 ton range
17 posted on 10/13/2003 6:01:34 PM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Marines are Pretty Smart!!


18 posted on 10/13/2003 6:21:51 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Where do you people get this stuff on a momnets notice? Not that there's anything wrong with it.
19 posted on 10/13/2003 6:25:11 PM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JOE6PAK
Didn't the Marine Corps or Air Force maintain a shuttle at Vandenberg?

USAF. There is a launch facility at Vandenberg run by the Air Force Space Command (whose unofficial motto is "in your face from outer space").  It was prepped to launch Shuttles, at the cost of billions, but the Shuttle has never launched from anywhere but Florida. Vandenberg is a better place for polar orbit insertion.  I think that only the engineering mock up Shuttle, Pathfinder (now at Huntsville), or perhaps the drop test Enterprise (now at the new Smithsonian Air & Space annex), were ever at Vandenberg, in order to test the set up and mating facilities.  They do, however, use it for unmanned launches for that orbit, as well as test launches of ICBMs into the Pacific.  It's been used for that for quite some time, before the Shuttle, even before Mercury.

There were lots of arguments about using it for the Shuttle, until Challenger. Once that Shuttle blew up during ascent they decided the risk of stuff falling on civilian areas was too great and the Shuttle facility was put in "caretaker" status, which it will likely never come out of. 

20 posted on 10/13/2003 6:26:18 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson