Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pietro
However, as a first time offender I believe his punishment would be slight.

And I agree totally. As a first time offender, Rush should neither recieve anything more, or less; than what anyone else would get.

I admire Rush. I listen to him when I can; I have purchased both of his books, and usually agree with his points (but not always). I respect his ability to very clearly and suscintly illustrate his points. One of the points I have disagreed with him on, is how he treats the "war on drugs'. Now, he is involved with the consequences of his actions. If he had espoused the 'WOD' like I had; I would have had some sympathy for him. As he was a leader in the "Prohibition" view of WOD, I find it amusing how hypocritical this has become.

56 posted on 10/13/2003 7:57:27 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar


As a first time offender, Rush should neither recieve anything more, or less; than what anyone else would get.

There's a really good chance that means jail. Apparently, Rush received Fedex shipments of drugs from out-of-state. If that does prove to be the case, federal mandatory minimums will kick in - the majority of first time users who get sentenced under Federal law do go to jail (about 80%, I believe).
90 posted on 10/13/2003 12:11:00 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson