To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj
"Hull and Obama should take care of that."
I think we need to pray for Hull to buy his way to the RAT nomination. Have you ever seen a picture of Hull? Not only does he not "look Senatorial," he looks like a monkey's behind. (On the other hand, it seems to me that Hynes and Obama are fairly good-looking guys, but I'll ask my wife to make sure.) There's NO WAY that Hull can beat Jack Ryan. Even pro-choice women, pro-gun-control suburban will vote for someone who looks like Ryan over someone who looks like Hull. It may sound shallow, but having a good-looking young candidate instead of an ugly old one is worth at least 3% in the final vote. Do you think Jon Edwards could have beaten Lauch Faircloth if the two switched looks?
Another thing, we need to avoid guys with mustaches, at least white guys with mustaches. Every time they showed a white guy with a mustache on Election Night 2002, it was to say he had lost. And we all know that we haven't had a president with facial hair since William Howard Taft . . . .
7 posted on
07/12/2003 12:20:30 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Corzine doesn't look senatorial to me either. He looks like he should be a hollywood producer or Berkley Prof.
Hull is indeed ugly as rats should be. I only hope you're right about people voting for the better looking guy.
Poor mustached men. :( It's all Dewey's fault.
The only one who won in 02 I can think of is Dr. Gingrey in Georgia.
14 posted on
07/13/2003 3:55:33 AM PDT by
Impy
(Dear Justice O'Connor, If you want to see your cat alive again.....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson