Replies

Do you have Adobe Acrobat? The link works just fine. I just checked it myself. What about them are suspect to you. They make perfect sense to me. You have Benson in the lead in the primary-- understandable because of his huge ad buys where he hasn't gone negative against another Republican (unlike Humphrey), and then you have Humphrey who is about as well-known as Benson, then you have Keough who is only slightly known. Regarding the general election match-up, Humphrey is behind-- but he did lose in 2000, too-- so what's the surprise?

I do have Adobe Acrobat...and still can't get to the numbers.

Until I see who did the polling, who was polled, what the method and questions were and what the margin of error is, I will remain skeptical.

There are polls and then there are polls.

May I ask...are you employed by the Bensen campaign?

That's odd simply because Humphrey was considered a shoo-in for the nomination a few monthes ago. But Humphrey lost the 2000 election, so I can see why Republicans would be reluntant to run him again. Best run a new face with all the pampered politician's kids dominating the NH GOP.

Other than silly "sign up for my brigage" logo (people might think he's a Buchanan-style candidate) The only problem I can see is he doesn't list his stance on abortion on his website. Considering New Hampshire is a conservative state (Benson clearly tells people he's pro-2nd amendment on that site), I wonder why not. My only guess is that his pro-life credentials aren't that good.

If any NH Freepers can vouch for this guy as a strong pro-life candidate, then by all means he deserves the nomination. We're in desperate need to replace some 'RAT governorships in November with all the vunerable GOP governors (including my own state, where the 'RATs are actually trying to associate the corrupt RINO governor with the current nominee, even though their candidate is far closer to the current governor's cronies).