Posted on 06/17/2020 1:11:44 PM PDT by Zenyatta
You don’t really think that’s gonna stop em do ya? The US Constitution is for racists dontchaknow.
I’ve never understood how legislatures or government organizations can “rescind” laws established by voter propositions. How come propositions are not considered “settled law?”
Just give them the degree without actually attending. Just deem them graduated. Then just deem them a job too. Then a house. Then food. ......hell just cut to the quick, deem them retired and give them 100k per year retirement with full benefits. .... It’s the white thing to do. It’s a good thing
If the failures are put into race/ethnicity there will be many FROWNS on the college boards and there will be many more calls of racism.
But those with brains KNOW that not everyone should be in college. It requires knowing how to read and write, especially with words longer than one syllable.
There are people smart enough for college who would be DELIGHTED to be a chef, police officer, postal worker, tinker, tailor, soldier, spy...oops, I'm running afield now.
Students from all over the world get their country to PAY the out-of-country fees. They want the B.S./B.A. degree from the USA. It means a great deal.
I wanted to be in the FBI when I was young. :o)
They just want to make it easier, t do what they have been doing all along.
Its not like Blacks need to have as good grades or test scores today, to get admitted ahead of Asians.
It’s just another college I will not hire from.
No...institutional racism is preventing them from getting a fair chance you see? Bexcause they didn’t include the name Jaquon and Tamaralyn in enough readong passages in high school standardized tests you see?
Ive never understood how legislatures or government organizations can rescind laws established by voter propositions. How come propositions are not considered settled law?
Despite what they may say in public, the faculty who teach at those colleges are NOT happy.
Our kid went to an UC almost a decade ago. During the first course taken that required a research paper, the guidelines were (a) pick a side on the topic, (b) search the information, (c) write a paper supporting your position, and (d) don't plagiarize.
The first words out of some of these student's mouths were "What do I need to do to get an "A" on this paper?". So many of the students a decade ago were grade driven and not taught how to apply information to a subject.
I have to think this is only going to get worse with their latest decision, if it hasn't already in the past 5+ years.
But i thought that we are all equal...
*research the information
Nope. Because of racism, some are at a disadvantage. Or so goes the narrative.
The long-term impact of this is masses of semi-literates waving worthless degrees demanding equal pay to real students who earned them (actually learned).
We are propagating a two-tiered system in which a high school diploma in the hands of a white or Asian person is the equivalent of a Masters Degree in the hands of certain others.
Yea but they get 100% of those 66.6 dropouts guaranteed student loans for the year.
Pretty good scam they got going on there...
In the meantime those idiots credit rating will be ruined for life.
Great system we got going on here..
It actually will hurt the Asians most. They have a ton more qualified students that will now be turned away. Youd think this would get them to vote for trump, but no. They wont.
More black entitlement.
I thought the courts said this is illegal. Does anybody know?
Noting that I am not up to speed with the specifics of this issue, my impression is that states have never expressly amended the Constitution to prohibit themselves from doing things like this.
In fact, President Thomas Jefferson had officially clarified in a State of the Union address that the states would first need to appropriately amend the Constitution in order for the feds to have the power to stick their big noses into INTRAstate schooling (my wording), something that the states have never done.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
So not only were the post-17th Amendment ratification Supremes probably once again amending the Constitution from the bench when they unconstitutionally dictated policy on this issue imo, this University of California policy ultimately depends on the threshold of pain of legal majority California citizen voters if, and with all due respect to California Freepers, the good citizens of California wake up to what is going on, or the Constitution is appropriately amended.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government Democrats and RINOs home in November!
Supporting PDJT with new patriot federal and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.
Thank you for answering my question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.