Posted on 05/08/2020 1:14:02 PM PDT by Zenyatta
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) suggested that “white privilege” played a role in the Justice Department’s (DOJ) decision to drop the criminal case of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
The DOJ announced Thursday it was dropping the case after the emergence of information over the past few weeks that indicated foul play by the FBI to get Flynn to lie during a January 2017 interview as part of then Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia probe.
(Excerpt) Read more at lacortenews.com ...
If white privilege was real she would have been deported long ago.
.
NO, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), This is White JUSTICE, which you don’t seem to comprehend.
False Accusations are against the Law HERE.
This here is NOT some benighted tyrannical Islamist ‘Do as we Say or Die’ type country YOU are living in.
You should be glad that you live where there is WHITE JUSTICE, or you might not be allowed to open your mouth to complain about something you don’t understand.
.
So lazy she can’t even land her thinking plane at the right airport.
The worst racists in our society have dark skin.
JoMa
Spoken like the true Islamofascist that she is.
Nothing at all to do with “white privilege.”
Omar obviously has no idea even what malicious prosecution is.Her ignorance could not be on better display.
***********************************
“Malicious prosecution is an intentional tort designed to provide redress for losses flowing from an unjustified prosecution....
“Under the first element of the test for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution at issue was initiated by the defendant. This element identifies the proper target of the suit, as it is only those who were actively instrumental in setting the law in motion that may be held accountable for any damage that results....”
“The second element of the tort demands evidence that the prosecution terminated in the plaintiff’s favour. This requirement precludes a collateral attack on a conviction properly rendered by a criminal court, and thus avoids conflict between civil and criminal justice. The favourable termination requirement may be satisfied no matter the route by which the proceedings conclude in the plaintiff’s favour, whether it be an acquittal, a discharge at a preliminary hearing, a withdrawal, or a stay. However, where the termination does not result from an adjudication on the merits, for example, in the case of a settlement or plea bargain, a live issue may arise whether the termination of the proceedings was in favour of the plaintiff....
“The third element which must be proven by a plaintiff — absence of reasonable and probable cause to commence or continue the prosecution — further delineates the scope of potential plaintiffs. As a matter of policy, if reasonable and probable cause existed at the time the prosecutor commenced or continued the criminal proceeding in question, the proceeding must be taken to have been properly instituted, regardless of the fact that it ultimately terminated in favour of the accused....
“Finally, the initiation of criminal proceedings in the absence of reasonable and probable grounds does not itself suffice to ground a plaintiff’s case for malicious prosecution, regardless of whether the defendant is a private or public actor. Malicious prosecution, as the label implies, is an intentional tort that requires proof that the defendant’s conduct in setting the criminal process in motion was fueled by malice. The malice requirement is the key to striking the balance that the tort was designed to maintain: between society’s interest in the effective administration of criminal justice and the need to compensate individuals who have been wrongly prosecuted for a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.”
***********************************************
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/M/MaliciousProsecution.aspx
That she is.
Just magnify the two images so you can look at them very closely. Compare the reflections in her eyes, the details of her lips, small imperfections in her face. You can't get that level of duplication in two photos of the same subject taken a minute apart, let alone in two supposedly different photo shoots. The right image was created from the left image.
[Did white privilege try to railroad him on concocted charges?]
Sssssssshhhh! Just remember that honky go free!
Those facts don’t matter when someone is trying to sell a race-baiting lie. You know, like Democrats regularly do.
Well since you brought it up..... in the Middle East they stone a woman accused of adultery......
Oh, the Left is far past regular. They’ve race card diarrhea, explosive no less.
Oh she’s just proving again what a total race instigator she is....People like this should not only leave office but go back to their nantive lands and clean those houses.
I’d be very happy if we didn’t allow another third worlder here in this nation. They raise their kids with their native-land beliefs rather than integrate to this country....and they never go back to those countries and try to improve those countries.
Her parents were wealthy in their own country, she’s never known anything but being taken care of.
Heh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.