Posted on 09/05/2019 9:19:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski predicted Thursday that President Trump will win by a wider electoral margin next year compared to his 2016 victory.
“My prediction is Donald Trump will win by a larger electoral margin than he did in the 2016 election,” Lewandowski told Hill.TV.
He was also optimistic about Trump’s ability to win three states that he lost in 2016: New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Nevada. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won all three states by a slim margin.
Trump received 304 electoral votes to Clinton's 227, for a 77-vote margin of victory.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Lot of words for a would-be candidate who said she won’t be a candidate.
Thought this article was about Lewandowski’s 2020 election prediction.
Liking and feeling it. Now it’s time to work and make it happen.
Dems are planning unprecedented cheating, bet on it.
But I'm hoping and praying for help from patriots such as Bikers for Trump.
I think you accidentally drank the Kool-Aid.
While I appreciate that you took the time to type all that out, none of it is even slightly convincing towards the end of claiming M.O. is a formidable potential candidate.
Regarding the black vote, it’s not a swing voting bloc. The only way this voting bloc can make a difference in outcome is if they abandon the Democrats. If they don’t, it’s situation normal. 100% of the upside with any changes to the black vote belongs to the GOP.
Media bias... another given. Another thing already dialed up so high in Dem-favoring bias there’s no more upside for them here. They’ve already got 100% o the positive coverage and 100% negative coverage of GOP opponents. There’s no more growth room in this sector for the Dems either.
Same goes for RINOs - they already exposed themselves opposing Trump the first time around, they have no credibility the second time around. This is an empty quiver.
All the factors you cite are environmental constants that have little or nothing to do with who the actual Democratic candidate is.
So the only thing left in the argument presented is the illusion that M.O. is somehow grassroots-popular. There is little no non-subjective evidence available to make that case.
Democrats should go into the election knowing that if they cheat their way to victory, their future is seige and starvation: no more food for the cities. No more getting in and out. No more electricity, either.
There have been no brokered conventions in the modern era.
The rules have been designed to avoid it.
The reason—no party wants to look like some party hacks picked the candidate in a back room—even if that is exactly what happened.
Rigging primaries and caucuses is the game now.
Brokered conventions are fun to talk about on political talk shows and university seminars—but these days they will not happen in the real world.
thoughtomator, you spoke truth to power. every word was well said. Thank you!
No. Donald Trump did not get 304 electoral votes.
Donald Trump got 306 electoral votes and there were two dicknipple electors.
He will get 320-340 in 2020, barring an incredibly weak DemoKKKrat candidate (that is to say, all of them) in which case he could get perhaps VA, NM, and ME as well.
Bloomberg has no shot at all.
His very authoritarian views and policies as NYC mayor aren’t going to sell. Nor will his massive hypocrisy in being the #1 Gun Grabber while have at least 19 armed former NYC police detectives on his own personal security detail.
Plus, he was all for stop and frisk and was quite explicit about wanting to target Black males.
When his male employees were accused of sexual harassment he was again quite explicit about not believing women and talked about demanding a really high standard of proof and he fought them tooth and nail in court.
Remember, this is Mr. no Big Gulps. Mr. no sugar or salt on the table in restaurants in the whole city. Mr. no soft drink vending machines and n schools. And on and on.
Good luck selling that to the American people.
Yep. That’s the big flaw in the MSM “analysis”. You can’t oppose something with nothing. The minute the Democrats have a nominee, Trump gets to start attacking - and all their candidates have huge flaws.
I used to think that, but after seeing photos of her on Long Island wearing a tent I changed my mind. I think it will be Warren/Richardson
I predict we do not win the house but hold the senate which is imperative for judges.
As for Trump, he wins if he doesn’t go crazy on gun control and he wins all the states he won last time around and takes MN,NH into his column, possibly Nevada and VA-long shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.