[2ndDivisionVet]

Now try that in West Virginia, Alabama or Idaho.

[DeathBeforeDishonor1]

Which translates from libtard loon speak to 2,000-3,000

[Raycpa]

Crowd size matters?

[Rusty0604]

Very true, but there’s people wanting free stuff everywhere. We need not be complacent.

[northislander]

Fake news on fake indian...

[plain talk]

This may be a sign they are positioning Warren to take over from Biden.

[DennisR]

Yeah...15,000 idiot liberals. Seattle has no shortage of them.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Here are some pictures of the event. I count about 60 people:
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/an-apology-a-packed-rally-and-a-plan-24-hours-with-warren/

This is a claim of a video of the event with thousands of people with her voice no picture of her:
Notice the wall at the stage is different and the people are standing on cement not grass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IceBWcoVnC0

[SaxxonWoods]

15,000.

She only invited Antifa?

[cableguymn]

How many were paid to be there?

[Secret Agent Man]

Maybe they all just wanted to see a rare white indian.

[realcleanguy]

All rich White Democrats. Funny how that is........Warren doesn’t attract any people of color. Could be her faking who she was for so many years

[northislander]

She’s not smart enough to count that high...

[Hostage]

No crowd shown.

Seattle Times makes no mention of crowd size by their own estimate:
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/elizabeth-warren-tells-crowd-of-15000-in-seattle-nobody-gets-to-stay-on-the-sidelines/

I smell BS.

Seattle Times mentions only the following in regards to crowd size:

"Warren, who’s known for her two-dozen or so detailed policy plans to address specific issues, spoke on a broader level to a crowd that her staff estimated at 15,000."

" The crowd size, she said, was evidence that “people are ready for change in Washington."

If the crowd size were truly more than 10,000. I would expect the Seattle Times to go all in with it and blast it for days. But they stayed mum which makes me think her actual numbers were maybe 1200 - 1500. And Seattle Center, this is key, has on a sunny summer weekend day anywhere from 2000-3000 on average. So the crowd just sort of meandered over to where she was ranting.

Believe me, I live here, most every person here is NOT going to show up for Elizabeth Warren. There are so many other things to do. And the attendee comments in the Seattle Times above point to that precisely. Here's an example:

“The only thing I am worried about is she might get stuck in the weeds,” said Matthies, a Lynnwood resident. “A president needs to think about the big picture.”

And here's another:

Charlie Lapham, who works for the Martin Luther King County Labor Council, likes Warren but is undecided.

“Electability is important,” he said. “I want to see if she can make a connection with people.”

And those are the only two liberal like comments that the Seattle Times reports. If there was a groundswell of enthusiastic passionate supporters, this newspaper would have run for at least three pages with the news.

Let's hope Warren is the Democrat nominee. She is not charismatic, not attractive, not inspiring, not smart, not commanding, in sum, a great candidate to lose the election by a landslide.

[Vendome]

Fail of tears...

[Nifster]

meh. Those are overflow numbers for Trump

Get the ground game going

[AmericanCheeseFood]

A town hall is where people are showing up wanting to ask questions.

I’d probably want to go to ask questions.

If it suddenly got turned into a rally however, I’d just want to leave, seems like she’s scamming herself some crowds.

[familyop]

Well, yeah. Seattle is on drugs.

[joma89]

Big deal. Washington state is a guarantee. Go get that many in Michigan or Pennsylvania.

JoMa

[Maris Crane]

SEATTLE, is Moscow on the Puget Sound.

[Bon mots]

Chief $#itting Bull.

That PowWow is maybe 1,500 - clearly not 15,000 - this woman does nothing but lie.