There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?

Yahoo! News ^ | May 17, 2019 | Andrew Romano

[digger48]

maybe because she doesn’t stand a chance in Hell of winning the top slot nomination

[NorthMountain]

Kamaltoe has a problem … there’s nobody she can “sleep with” to be given the presidency.

[thoughtomator]

This is the point where they figure out that every Democrat candidate being also considered as VP is, if picked, an assassination threat to any other Democrat candidate.

None of them can trust each other any more than we trust them, and none can turn his back on the next.

[Lurkinanloomin]

She’s not eligible for either.

[chajin]

why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?

Because if she has any political smarts she knows no one has a snowball's chance in New Orleans to beat Trump in 2020, but looking good enough as a VP candidate would make her the automatic front runner for 2024. (And unlike with Sarah Palin, the media would support her in this.)

[Navy Patriot]

So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?

She'll fit under the Resolute Desk easier during those National Security meetings.

[alloysteel]

Ms. Harris has a LOT of competition for the “last cookie on the plate”, as I have seen the vying for vice president so succinctly described. Stacey Abrams, for one, and Pete Buttigieg, for another, seem to be the leading favorites for the slot.

What would Ms. Harris bring to the table? Certainly not a sweet disposition.

[BenLurkin]

“There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?”

Is it just me or is that a total non sequitur?

[Leaning Right]

Why do I always have to think of everything?

There is a very simple solution to this mess. The Democratic National Committee should just change its rules to make white men ineligible for nomination.

Of course, there will be the problem of white men self-identifying as a black lesbians, or whatever. I’ll leave it to the DNC to work out those details.

[Vigilanteman]

Maybe because she’s an idiot who is totally unqualified. Yeah, I know, that didn’t stop ObaMao. But the novelty of first black president (even if he was, at most, 3/8th black) has long since worn off.

[cuban leaf]

Kamala is an anchor baby.

[Cowboy Bob]

How would any of the potential 2020 Democrat VPs be more qualified by 2024? They ALL lack gravitas. How can any of them obtain gravitas by 2024?

[Ouderkirk]

Maybe because she is INELLIGIBLE for either office

[lgjhn23]

The “heels-up, knees-wide” KamalToe isn’t even eligible for POTUS or VP. As stated above, she’s an anchor baby. She’s also unqualified and barely made it as “Willie’s Mattress”

[Da Coyote]

What’s the “settle” about?
She has a race “qualification” which is the ONLY thing she has. If she had a discernible IQ (goes for ALL the Dimbulbcrat candidates), she’d have a beef.

But she doesn’t so she doesn’t.

Lady, politics is the only place for idiots - oops, make that politics and journalism.

Get a real life, learn a useful trade, and if you fail, seriously consider seppuku. There are plenty of women out there much more capable than you. And they just happen to be conservative.

[SunkenCiv]

Partisan Media Shills update.

[Dr. Sivana]

Stacey Abrams, for one, and Pete Buttigieg, for another, seem to be the leading favorites for the slot.

Throw in O'Rourke and you have three Dems with a lot of buzz who all lost statewide races, and thought that qualified them for a promotion.

[Secret Agent Man]

I wonder if they ever get tired of writing the same old tripe.

[Reily]

My rule of thumb on presidential election viability

- “Can you win a state wide race?”

No !

So stop wasting people time!