$18 Billion buys a lot of intrigue.
People are sick and tired of the leftists using the decency of the American voters to twist politics against American interests.
Democrats faked a yearbook, forged Roy Moore’s signature and paid several women to lie against Moore and Trump
The media and democrats are doing a coup in Alabama
Democrats are pure evil and they are all marxists.
. This election in Alabama means as many as 3 supreme court nominees
This isn’t about any allleged sexual behavior but it’s about democrats turning America into socialist Venezuela. The Stakes couldn’t be higher.
And Roy Moore is innocent. Democrats are liars.
No reason to disbelieve accusers?
How about a fake yearbook and forged signature is the “evidence” ?
$18 Billion buys a lot of intrigue.
There’s no reason to not believe the accusers, except for motive and timing.
You’re an immoral idiot Governor!
Never Trumpers and drive by media radio talk hosts are having a field day ignoring the fact that all of the accusers were of the age of legal consent. Including the one claiming when 14 years old. For her accusations are the juiciest. Which they gleefully relate and dwell on in a touchy feel-ly manner as if it came off of a police report yesterday. Not as a unsubstantiated recollection from 40 years ago. Because they know these are damaging accusations which will be almost impossible to disprove.
Despite that fact that it has been uncovered that two of his accusers are working for the Perversion Party and that their accusations are false and politically motivated. The drivebys and the nevers media are not reporting this but are mentioning one accuser is a “Republican” .
Here is background on two accusers. One works for the perverts that one knows the one who claimed she was 14. But was actually 17 at the time? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3603606/posts
Latest charge : Grad book signature a forgery;
someone named Roy signed it Moore’s last name was added to it. Moore’s legal secretary verified Moore’s signature by placing her initials DA, on his rulings http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3605761/posts
Has the same non-reason to disbelieve Moore - there’s the rub that makes Dems insane (along with the McConnell butt boys) - treat the accused and the accuser with the same amount of credibility until such time as evidence surfaces.
I cannot vote for Roy Moore—but Would if I could .The Republicans want me to align with them — My response is Funding Republicans who have rejected all logic in a rush to do their little ZIPPO RAID on Roy Moore’s House (AL and the campaign for Senator) would be funding their bad behavior. Both Party need to be penalized for their actions in this State election process. But most of America does not Care about principled/ Moral leadership.
No reason to believe them either. Evidence, if any, coming from people that I don’t know or trust.
If Roy Moore loses, the swamp will have people come out saying X raped me or Y is homophobic. It is time to fight the American Marxists Swamp Creatures (aka Establishment). They don’t want a government of the people for the people, they want a government of the elites, for the elites. Roy Moore Senator, Mitch McConnell dumbass...
I suspect he dated, or attempted to date most any available person he met, and never asked for an ID. He doesn't seem to be into the bar scene type, so that would leave few other options.
Of the five accusers, no sex was even accused by any of them. The "yearbook" one is demonstrated to be a liar. Three of the remaining four were well over the age of consent.
To me, that leaves only the "14 year old" as problematic. There are inconsistencies in her story. The missing phone in her room is important. Other parts of her story are inconsistent with her mother's recollection, as well. She has also had a very inconsistent lifestyle in the intervening four decades. I place her in the category of having unreliable recollections, easily led by reporters hostile to Moore even to the point of mixing up recollections of other boyfriends, and possibly opportunistic to the point of being susceptible to "convenient" memories.
“I have no reason to disbelieve them.”
Then kindly state, Gov., your reason to believe them.
So what does that mean to me? We have a guy in his early 30s, with a tough spell in his 20s, who is attracted to (legal) but younger girls. He's a bit awkward and clumsy when approaching the targets of his affections, and he always without exception takes rejection like the gentleman he is.
Since then, he's married, and has a blameless if somewhat eccentric public career. He's now 70 years old.
My bottom line: This is nothing about nothing, gornisht mit gornisht as they say in Brooklyn.
BOOM!