[Vigilanteman]

I've never heard about USC Dornsife. Does anyone have any information on the details of the polling? Or the reliability of the pollster.

This just sounds too good to be true.

[2ndDivisionVet]

I imagine it’s affiliated with the University of Southern California.

[2ndDivisionVet]

I imagine it’s affiliated with the University of Southern California.

[bunster]

A rep for the poll company was on local Los Angeles radio yesterday and said that it is a rolling average and the results of the Dem convention will start appearing Sun-Mon.

Also, he said they also roll into results the voters likelihood of voting and he stressed that is what is different abut their polls. More likely to vote would weigh more.

[Red Badger]

It’s a new polling outfit, with different methods.

http://96.127.53.23/election/

[CaptainK]

I was the third most reliable poll in 2012. Somebody posted a chart yesterday.

[KC_Conspirator]

Its the RAND Group that is running it. They did one in 2012 and was pretty accurate.

[CaptainK]

Look at posts 12 and 13

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3453820/posts

[Intolerant in NJ]

Somebody - I think Krauthammer - was talking about this poll the other day - said to view it with some caution - apparently they have the same pool of 30,000 people which they draw randomly from over and over for their results - usually not advisable to repeat sample for something like this since decisions on a candidate once made are likely not to change - might be better to take independent samples which should reflect changes in voter sentiment over time more accurately.....