Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Something I am sure, but I am not sure what.
1 posted on 07/06/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

does breathing ring a bell???


27 posted on 07/06/2016 1:53:01 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Same thing he had on John Roberts [No, I don't mean those rumors some people love to spread].

Bureaucrats, like judges, are hesitant about getting involved in the political process (especially when it hurts the Democrats).

They're afraid of provoking some kind of massive reaction or backlash if they rule one party's candidate out of the race or strike down a recently enacted piece of major legislation.

So they punt and let somebody else have the responsibility of deciding.

28 posted on 07/06/2016 1:54:51 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Not Obama.

The Clinton Crime Family.


30 posted on 07/06/2016 1:59:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

The future of his children and grandchildren. And his mother.


34 posted on 07/06/2016 2:12:21 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey may own barbells...


35 posted on 07/06/2016 2:12:50 PM PDT by Aut Pax Aut Bellum (The Summer of 2016 is going to be interesting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
 photo ClintonObamaWitchesBrew_zpszhmcrc2o.jpg
37 posted on 07/06/2016 2:19:57 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Among other things Comey said in his runup to the conference was this:
“They (POTUS and AG) do not know what I am about to say.”

And yet Obama was out campaigning the same day with Hillary. The president knew, all right. That guy would never take the chance of flattering the heck out of Hillary, which he did, and letting her use the presidential seal, which he did, if he didn’t know the outcome.

Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation is most likely the correct one.

Comey took an extraordinary path to reveal Hillary’s lies, knowing that AG Lynch and POTUS would not only not indict, but would also squelch the details of the lies.

Comey was telling a lawyerly truth: They did know he would not recommend a criminal disposition. They didn’t know his exact words. He screwed em.

And, in return, his days will be numbered as FBI chief.


38 posted on 07/06/2016 2:31:34 PM PDT by StAntKnee ( Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey made a VERY smart move when he made his announcement:

1. This was his one and only legitimate opportunity to speak about this issue on his own, and he got in front of Lynch, whom he knew would simply “no comment” the media and sit on the investigation and any recommendations made in private if Comey had simply made a simple announcement that the FBI had turned their investigation over to Lynch and now the ball was in her court.

2. He was able to totally trash Hillary, officially contradicting her many lies she made about her email. Essentially, in a rational world, Comey’s statement should effectively end Hillary’s chance of winning the Presidency.

3. He inoculated himself from being fired.

4. He knew he would soon be “forced” to give additional information in a Congressional hearing, free from influence by Lynch or Obama.

5. And here’s the kicker: if an indictment had been recommended (which Comey and everyone else knows would go nowhere anyway), then NO information at all about the investigation could be released by anyone at the FBI or DoJ. None.


40 posted on 07/06/2016 2:43:35 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

GOOGLE “Comey + Whitewater”


41 posted on 07/06/2016 2:53:40 PM PDT by soozla (Truth prevails, regardless of who is willing to accept it ~ now or later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Someone should post this little tidbit in it’s own thread from the FBI website. It is from the FAQ section:

>>Does the FBI work through U. S. Attorneys?

Yes. Although the FBI is responsible for investigating possible violations of federal law, the FBI does not give an opinion or decide if an individual will be prosecuted. The federal prosecutors employed by the Department of Justice or the U.S. Attorneys offices are responsible for making this decision and for conducting the prosecution of the case.<< https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs


45 posted on 07/06/2016 3:03:36 PM PDT by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey wasn’t going to take out the Democrat presidential candidate over a server. It wasn’t going to happen.

That isn’t the fix. The fix is making sure FBI investigates the holy heck out of the server while ignoring the several hundred millions in bribe money sitting in Clinton bank accounts.

During the Clinton years we learned, we had a PHD course, in using investigations to cover up a scandal. You can spend millions investigating something, you can have hundreds of agents out investigating, but you just set the parameters so that whatever they find doesn’t cross any boundaries you don’t want crossed.


46 posted on 07/06/2016 3:30:47 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Nothing


47 posted on 07/06/2016 3:35:15 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey or bukaki, same thing.


49 posted on 07/06/2016 3:44:54 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

He needn’t have anything. They’re both fecking democrats.


53 posted on 07/06/2016 7:40:29 PM PDT by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson