Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's Meeting with the FBI Means She Will Soon Be Indicted and Plea Bargain Guilty
The Santa Monica Observer ^ | July 2, 2016 | David Ganezer

Posted on 07/02/2016 8:37:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton was reportedly 'Cooperative" today as 3 FBI Agents grilled her for 3 hours.

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton met agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigations on Saturday. When investigators meet with the "target defendant," it generally means their investigation is swiftly coming to a conclusion, legal experts say.

The investigators now know what the questions are, and depending on Mrs. Clinton's responses, will recommend to the Department of Justice whether or not charges are appropriate. In other words, they want to question the Defendant, while of course video-taping her, to see how she might look to a jury.

After her now infamous meeting with former President Bill Clinton at Sky Harbor tarmac on Thursday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that she would accept whatever the FBI agents working on the case decided. In other words, she'll file charges if the FBI wants to proceed, and not file charges if they advise her to instead just close the file. So it's OK that she met with the FBI target's husband--she's not the decision maker. And besides, no ethical rule forbids it.

So where do we go from here? Mrs. Clinton will probably have to appear in Federal Court and plead Not Guilty at an arraignment. At that time, her attorneys and Justice Dept. attorneys might discuss resolution of the matter. In fact, they may have already agreed to a plea arrangement, which may be put on the record the afternoon of the morning Clinton is arraigned.

The Justice Department's goal is to complete the investigation and make recommendations on whether charges should be filed before the two major party conventions take place toward the latter half of July, sources said....

(Excerpt) Read more at smobserved.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintongate; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: stonehouse01

...and e mailed her as well...

There was a top EPA person who used private email for work purposes.
I now EXPECT all 0bama staff and Czars use personal email, and perhaps servers, to conceal their treason and corruption.

The entire scheme, framework, and instruction prolly came from Rham Emmanuel and Valerie Jarret


81 posted on 07/03/2016 6:58:21 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

Exactly. We are so screwed unless Trump wins. Speaking of snakes (NY Post cover) Valerie Jarrett looks just like a copperhead.


82 posted on 07/03/2016 7:05:15 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dream on.


83 posted on 07/03/2016 7:06:16 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

It is just this guy’s opinion, no more valid than yours or mine. His thinking is more realistic and less ideological than most journalists.

Somehow, I do not see Hillary plea-bargaining on anything. She can count on crony prosecutors to intentionally foul up any case in court. She will have a DC jury of her peers — selected from a jury pool that is 95% Democrat, and 100% gullible morons. Her attorneys will challenge all the evidence as tainted and plead arcane technicalities, then lay on emotional drivel, sexism, etc. Indicting her is one thing, convicting quite another, and she knows it.


84 posted on 07/03/2016 7:54:26 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Trump needs to get his team to write up a mock indictment.


85 posted on 07/03/2016 8:16:09 AM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“So it’s OK that she met with the FBI target’s husband—she’s not the decision maker. And besides, no ethical rule forbids it.”

its not OK
she is the decision maker
ethics forbids it

This thing is on rails and was heading to a fixed conclusion until BJ stuck his beak into the picture...
remember political appointees were picked by loretta to be on comey’s “team”
the investigation was tainted from the start...

clinton appointed loretta
loretta is a clinton loyal, holder-clone (black panthers, fast and furious etc...)
the only reason to meet “in secret” on a private plane is to cut a deal...
clinton never did play golf in 110 degreee temps in phoenix and diverting a plane for the sake of family chit chat while she was enroute to colorado involved diverting the plane deliberately and his waiting for the planned arrival.... not a chance encounter...
CORRUPTION...

we want an independent prosecutor...


86 posted on 07/03/2016 8:26:03 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah
Indicting her is one thing, convicting quite another, and she knows it.

Yes indeed. And she is always conniving.

87 posted on 07/03/2016 5:56:19 PM PDT by Mr Apple (WADDLING HILLARY >> COOKIES, CANDIES, CAKE, DESSERTS & CASHEWS....the WALRUS LOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
The thing is, that is the only explanation. Does quantum superposition allow for different on/off, yes/no, multiple possibilities across the separate bubbles in the percolating universe?

There is a precedence for this:

Dr. Edward De Bono invented the word "PO" as intermediate between YES and NO ...in his book Lateral Thinking

Also in Japanese "HAI" does not mean YES...... it means "I heard you"


88 posted on 07/04/2016 4:52:59 AM PDT by spokeshave (Somewhere there is a ceiling for Trump.....Yeah, it's called The Oval Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson