Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; NFHale; ...

There is a lot to like about Jeff Sessions, but he’s kind of long in the tooth. Bob Corker would do nothing for me.

As for Michael Flynn, I’ve been hearing rumors about a retired general being chosen. Flynn has great potential, and he certainly has impressive national security credentials. I’d need to know more about him, though.


64 posted on 05/26/2016 4:13:20 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The barbarians are inside because there are no gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; randita; NFHale; StoneWall Brigade; ...

The FBI is looking at Corker’s finances.

That’s

A)Another reason not to want Corker
B)Possibly a troubling sign that he is indeed the behind the scenes frontrunner, the probe could be politically motivated for that reason

Corker would be an uninspired, stinky choice.

Flynn is a registered Marxist-Leninist (democrat) and has described himself “as centrist as possible”. I didn’t like the idea of some random, non-political General as Vice President, but one that isn’t even a Republican? Unacceptable. Give me a break. He doesn’t have any “potential” other than the potential to p**s me off and the potential to make us wish that it was Corker instead.

Age aside, Sessions is far far FAR and away the best choice of those 3, bar none. He could be 104 years old and he would STILL be FAR better than Corker and FAAAAAARRR better than a DEMOCRAT like Flynn.


70 posted on 05/26/2016 11:54:42 PM PDT by Impy (Did you know "Hillary" spelled backwards is "Bitch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson