Incorrect. Quite incorrect!
What about those.........who are on the fence -and undecided?
Oh, that's right. Undecided folks don't have memories.
Any undecideds who have a “cloud” of doubt from the NE (and related stories) fall into the category I described:
“the gossiping clucking hens of this country who have no moral compass of their own and live for stories such as this to hide from their own inadequacies.”
This is my point. Cruz was never going to win such degenerate, a-moral people anyway, so who cares what such gossip lovers think, decided or undecided. If this election is decided by voters who voted (or didn’t vote) for a candidate because of an Enquirer article, we’ve got bigger problems than Ted Cruz.
I don’t deny such people exist, my only point is that they aren’t in any kind of majority. All Cruz has to do, if Hillary is stupid enough to bring this up at the debates, is ask “How’s that brain tumor Hillary?” This story has no impact on thinking, rational adults. Only for those who gossip is already “truth” does it matter (”it’s the seriousness of the charge”, not whether it’s actually true, that makes it worth considering to such people, which is the definition of amorality actually. Amorality is ignorance of the truth)
And by the way, using the fact of their existence, using the fact that people who love and apparently live off of gossip exist, as a REASON to continue to bring UP said gossip, well that’s just stupid.