Posted on 04/02/2016 7:07:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
telling insight into yesterday's speculation-igniting, closed-door meeting between Donald Trump and top officials at the Republican National Committee -- via the New York Times:
(GRAPHIC-AT-LINK)
It's almost as if surrounding yourself with unsuccessful people actually isn't a wise way to run a presidential campaign, a realization that may belatedly be dawning on Trump. Turning to a new Politico report, is the Republican frontrunner aware of these realities? The math is difficult as it is -- particularly if he loses Wisconsin and especially if his South Carolina delegate haul is actually in some danger. And as we've discussed previously, Team Trump is being seriously out-organized in the crucial shadow campaign for delegates....
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Bankruptcies?
Who, exactly is “Ethics Scoreboard?” Some blog run by sundance?
Guy “Log Cabin” Benson been working hard for the money lately.
Research away....
Leni
“Clownhall”
Dittos to that.
Back in early February, I made a bunch of the nastycruzers squeal when I posted articles for a few days like you cruzer agitprop people do.
Of course, I'm not walking out to the mailbox twice a month for a living, nor am I getting paid for posting articles.
You have to have a fair amount of leisure time to post like you do. :)
Post some agitprop BS, get called on it, then post MORE agitprop BS.
Other posters are calling you on your agitprop BS on this thread.
Best attend to them, but you might run out of ways to slam them using sundance... LOL! :)
I have never been paid a dollar from any political campaign. On the other hand, I’m nearing $200,000 in funds raised. And my “income” such as it is is from disabilities incurred while in the armed forces. Feel free to mock that here at a conservative site.
I didn't say anything about YOU personally, so you needn't take it personally.
Please don't accuse me of mockery, when there was none.
You asked me a question about posting articles, I responded with my well-informed view of the matter.
He does well with the people not the snakes in the shadows, no doubt.
I’m a shut in. “Housebound” and “Totally and Permanently Disabled” is what the Department of Veterans Affairs calls it. I’d probably switch with you in a heartbeat. I worked hard my whole life until this overcame me.
My prediction, er, maybe:
Cruz will never be the delegate. But he might be veep.
There is nothing the gop would like more than to shut Cruz up. And a great way to do that would be to make him vice president behind a rino. He could sit there in the senate with his warm bucket of piss and wait for a tie so he could be relevant. Don’t be surprised if this happens.
Must’ve hit a nerve.
Oh, piff. Thousands of lottery winners would argue the point.
What's more likely? The most common way to create a small fortune in business is to start with a large one.
Were those lottery winners raised by a real estate developer like Don was?
The GOPee should perhaps ask themselves whether what they hope to win is greater than what they will assuredly lose.
His father left him a few million, not 200.
Just giving you a little heads-up on the doom-n-gloom thingee.
This is the kind of thing you USED to be known for:
FRANCE: Jihad in the Ranks of the Gendarmerie and the Army
Director Blue ^ | April 2, 2016 | Baron Bodissey
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3416923/posts
The bottom line is that the Media DeathStar and its Uniparty crew are driving the "negative waves" [hat-tip to "Oddball"] inundating this primary season.
This particular website is an inside-ball political website with a select audience.
We have little in common with the ordinary voters out there in the real world.
The fact is that there are MANY more ordinary voters that are getting involved in the process this primary season - and it's because of a dawning perception of a rigged game.
Heck, I myself voted for the first time in a primary in my life. It felt pretty great.
At any rate, if the Lucy VanPelt Uniparty snatches the ball away from Charlie Brown the ordinary voter THIS TIME, there's a chance that Charlie Brown might not take it lying down.
And that's Charlie Brown the Democrat voter, and Charlie Brown the Republican voter.
I'm not sure what you think you're doing - your agitprop [because that's what they are] article posts are not affecting Charlie Brown the Republican voter, or Charlie Brown the Democrat voter.
They're affecting the FR base, and debasing the power of the FR forum.
However, it ain't my forum, and it's a Free Republic.
So carry on. I've said my piece to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.