I am not a troll. I have been on this site since 1998. Why do you insist on using young innocent children to demonstrate your worthless points?
I think that there is literally a reasonable suspicion that at least one of the children in those picture, may not have been sired by Amanda's husband, based on the statistics I mentioned in my post #13, in conjunction with the identification of Amanda as one of the rumored mistresses in the Enquirer story, Amanda's tweets and Instagrams, and other evidence which you would find distasteful (e.g. tracking the dates of an RNC convention to the birth of one of the children being 9 months), as well as the photographs.
Not to mention Cruz's and Snarly's behaviour at the press conference which I described in a recent vanity. The reported handed him a lifeline of words to say to make the scandal go away, and he declined; Snarly stepped in for him.
And, finally, rumors of that near-breakdown by Heidi: consistent with having found out Ted had had an affair; and her disappearance from campaign events instead of standing by him: and rumors floating around of her having filed for divorce a few years back and then withdrawing the filing (or something similar).
I am not insisting, nor jumping up and down saying "this proves it!" : but, if it IS true, we should politically slam Cruz back into the stone age or worse. Washington is enough of a cesspool, that if we have this many "coincidences" we owe it to ourselves and the political process, to check them out. We don't have to check Trump out because he has openly admitted his affairs: hypocrisy, and therefore the ability to lie to people who trust him, is therefore not one of his besetting sins: which is important when one is placed in a position of stewardship under tremendous pressure.