Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, the Delegates Can Decide
The National Review ^ | March 29, 2016 | Rich Lowry, editor

Posted on 03/29/2016 6:55:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

so why do we vote then?

Come on this is the establishment who thinks we are scum and they know better. Because we are not doing what they want they want to do this and give us an appearance we get a say when clearly now we don’t if we go by their crap.


21 posted on 03/29/2016 7:17:52 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

IIRC some of those delegates are FReepers. Maybe ask them what they’re thinking.


22 posted on 03/29/2016 7:19:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: irishMN

At the 1860 Republican convention, William Seward had 173.5 delegates on the first ballot. Abraham Lincoln had just 102. 233 votes were required to nominate.

Try to convince me why we should get behind this Lincoln fellow. I’m writing in Seward and throwing the election to Douglass or Breckenridge.


23 posted on 03/29/2016 7:21:24 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

name them and I will.


24 posted on 03/29/2016 7:21:59 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rich frigging Lowry the pompous elitist establishment hack, god grief.


25 posted on 03/29/2016 7:22:35 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Sorry, my memory is going. But they my self-identify.


26 posted on 03/29/2016 7:23:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

I think its pretty clear by now that the establishments main going is to deny Trump the Presidency.

Even if it means Hillary for President.

They don’t realize that this will be the end of the Republican party.


27 posted on 03/29/2016 7:24:14 PM PDT by crusher2013 (8Liberalism is Aristocracy masquerading as equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So there are 5 Rubio delegates and 5 party leaders.

Why is the guy so sure he will go 0-10 with them.

Is that realistic?

It is as if he has gone around bad mouthing Rubio for the past five months alienating all of Rubios delegates.

Or gone around bashing party leaders...

Poor little baby is tossin a Trumpertantrum.


28 posted on 03/29/2016 7:24:29 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

This is what I was thinking if our vote means nothing in the primary why do they hold a vote?


29 posted on 03/29/2016 7:27:07 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

Why two - Douglas and Breckenridge. There is only one Democrat party.

Oh, that’s right, sitting Vice President Breckenridge was so unhappy that he was going to loose to Douglas that he spilt the party into two.

Then he took the states that he had power in and got them all to secede,

Looks like the moron tossed the race to Lincoln.


30 posted on 03/29/2016 7:27:43 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: funfan

Trump got his 12 delegates from the primary.

Cruz got his 11 delegates.

Trump got his 6 delegates from the Caucus.

Cruz got his 7 delegates from the Caucus

Rubio got his 5 delegates from the Caucus.

The standing party leadership goth their 5 seats birther of their position.

That is why we vote.


31 posted on 03/29/2016 7:30:20 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown
Try to convince me why we should get behind this Lincoln fellow. I’m writing in Seward and throwing the election to Douglass or Breckenridge.

That wasn't quite what I asked. I was just curious why Lincoln was elected vs. the other guy.

I know nothing about those guys so I really can't comment on your response.
32 posted on 03/29/2016 7:30:52 PM PDT by irishMN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

GOPe is in bed with the Democrats for a Hillary presidency.

See:

Tech billionaires (major Dem donors) plot with GOP leaders at exclusive island resort to stop Trump

http://nypost.com/2016/03/08/tech-billionaires-plot-with-gop-leaders-to-stop-trump-at-exclusive-island-resort/

You can edit this page.


33 posted on 03/29/2016 7:31:34 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Happens to all LOL. My wife said I seem to forget what she wants doing too


34 posted on 03/29/2016 7:33:10 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: crusher2013
They don’t realize that this will be the end of the Republican party.

Nor do they care.If they can take out Conservatives and Christians by doing that, they will do it gladly. They would much prefer a Hillary Presidency to a Conservative Presidency.

As far as Trump goes, I don't know how the Establishment are going to take him out, but I have a feeling that they are. They might George Wallace him, or they may Robert Kennedy him. Because if he does a tenth of what he says he will do, he is going to cost them a tremendous amount of money. And for someone who would sell their mother, wife, daughter, or sister to the whorehouse for a penny, for the money Trump will cost them, there is no limit to the depths they will sink.

35 posted on 03/29/2016 7:35:38 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: irishMN

I found this on wiki a few days ago. The third ballot showed Lincoln within three votes. Four people changed from Seward to Lincoln, and then another 50+ followed and they called it a “corrected” ballot. Not sure why they didn’t just have a fourth ballot.

Excerpt:

Lincoln was represented at the convention by his friends Leonard Swett, Ward Hill Lamon, and David Davis. During the night of May 17–18, [after the first ballot] they worked frantically to win anti-Seward delegates for Lincoln. They showed that Lincoln already had the most support after Seward, which persuaded some. They also made a deal with Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania, who recognized that he had no chance of winning the nomination himself. Cameron controlled the Pennsylvania delegation, and he offered to trade his support for the promise of a cabinet position for himself and control of Federal patronage in Pennsylvania. Lincoln did not want to make any such deal; from Springfield, he telegraphed to Davis “I authorize no bargains and will be bound by none”.[8] Despite this restriction, Davis reached an understanding with Cameron, which eventually led to Cameron’s appointment as Secretary of War.


36 posted on 03/29/2016 7:38:34 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

A million Americans (the equivalent of over ten million today died during the Civil War and the casualties and broken families were many times that number.

LIncoln was a disaster for which this country is still paying a high price. Tell me about that great brokered convention and wise decisions by those who “knew” better.


37 posted on 03/29/2016 7:44:35 PM PDT by georgiarat (Obama, providing incompetence since Day One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“Why do they needs Voters ?”

Exactly. Why bother to vote if the delegates can do what they want.


38 posted on 03/29/2016 7:50:05 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; manc
I'm a delegate to our state convention (first time). I doubt that I would be elected to go to the national convention as that will be for people that are far more active in the GOP in my state.

My state (Washington) has a caucus AND a primary vote for the Republicans. At my caucus it was primarily Cruz voters, and they made up the bulk of those elected to go to the state convention.

IF I were to make it to nationals, and say that Mr. Trump won our primary, I would vote for Mr. Trump based on the primary results. (I was told we HAVE TO, but I'm not sure if that is legally binding - there have been national elections where a few delegates did not vote for who they were supposed to vote for.)

If Mr. Trump doesn't receive 50% + 1 at the national on the first ballot, then the delegates from Washington can vote for whomever. Other states have other rules.

IF it were me, I would vote for Cruz based on the information I have today. My announced support for Cruz at my district caucus does not bind me to him. I imagine that for a second ballot at the national they will be looking at the delegate totals like they did when Lincoln won. If it looks like Trump or Cruz would be the winner, many may jump on the band wagon to show that the GOP delegates are mostly in agreement rather than a split party.

39 posted on 03/29/2016 7:52:21 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: georgiarat

Seward positions on slavery were pretty much identical to Lincoln’s, and he had a longer record of advocating them in office. He was as hated in the South as Lincoln. There would still have been secession and Civil War would still have happened if Seward was elected President.

The Civil War was a great tragedy. Slavery was a great evil, and it would have been better if the South had been willing to phase out slavery peacefully.


40 posted on 03/29/2016 7:56:30 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson