Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz and Rubio to remain on ballot, Broward judge rules
The Sun Sentinel ^ | March 4, 2016 | Rafael Olmeda

Posted on 03/04/2016 6:55:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

While it’s gratifying to see all this interest in constitutionalism, watching Trump’s supporters going full bore paleocon fundie drama queen on Ted’s citizenship status and standing down when Trump tells the Iowa voters he’ll keep the EPA and their ethanol mandate looks more like they’re reading Alinsky than Madison.


61 posted on 03/05/2016 5:19:08 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

I just tell everybody I know. Many agree, you know it too.


62 posted on 03/05/2016 5:47:44 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Thank you for your polite response.

It doesn’t seem to me that any authority is going to tell anyone that they can’t run for president based on where or how they were born.

If by “authority” you mean any living public official (as opposed to the Constitution), it appears you may be correct.

The states, however, do make an attempt to do so when they require candidates to certify they are eligible for the office. It seems clear by that requirement the states must believe they have an interest to protect, but it also seems clear they will not bother to enforce that requirement if a particular candidate’s eligibility is challenged. Nor does it appear the Congress will take action to examine eligibility despite the statutory tool it gave itself for that specific purpose.

And all of that is a shame, because the founders expressly specified in the language of the day the requirements for who could fill the office of the President. Unfortunately, there are those today who say, “Candidate X is eligible because the founders did not spell out in clear terms that he isn’t eligible.”

Cruz and Rubio may be fine citizens and patriots, but we ignore the Constitution at our nation’s risk.

63 posted on 03/05/2016 6:15:05 AM PST by frog in a pot (That an NBC could be born in a foreign country to a foreign parent delights the one-world crowd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
"No. They are knuckledraggers."

Yes because obviously someone that would not even be considered a citizen of the United States before the 1934 NATURALIZATION ACT is a natural born citizen of the USA. The founders clearly said that anyone born anywhere is a natural born US citizen.

Historians date the end of the Roman Empire to be the first day a not Roman took the title of Emperor. Future historians will do the same for us. The day a known not natural born citizen takes the presidency will be the day the Republic dies.

64 posted on 03/05/2016 6:18:55 AM PST by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Wish in one hand, poop in the other. Now which filled faster?


65 posted on 03/05/2016 6:45:28 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson