This is not the original article by Peggy Noonan which was excellent but the National Review’s hit piece on the article.
If he were to be eliminated, I would almost certainly prefer Trump to Rubio (for reasons that will emerge later). And though it’s just possible that I would endorse a worthy third-party conservative if nominee Trump were shown to be even more of an unguided missile than hitherto, I cannot see myself casting a vote for Hillary Clinton — not least because, as a British citizen with a green card, I don’t have a vote to cast.
Ok, haven’t read this yet. Honest impression of the headline is that this is some kind of attack on Rubio and Cruz being undocumented aliens
First look is the source. If I see NRO, I’m done. We know their slant. No need to keep flogging the dead horse. They’re not bringing anything new to the game.
Holy crap.
A balanced article from NRO?
Thanks for posting - and I actually went to NRO and read it. You know I’m Trump all the way, but I recognize his faults, and the article mentions them but doesn’t focus on them.
What Sullivan seems to be getting at has been reported in the Washington Times which was the loose conduct of that caucus suggesting fraud . In some of the FR postings the trumpbots immediately bring up Iowa. Which was well conducted no compairison to what apparently went on there and Cruz legitimately won. And should be dismissed as sour grapes.