[Artcore]

Sounds good to me.

I will vote for either Trump or Cruz...gladly!

[Utmost Certainty]

I thought we were supposed to be electing a leader, not a captain of the debate team.

[skr]

A debate between Cruz, Trump, Hillary and Bernie would be even more interesting.

[MagnoliaB]

How about we just follow the rules that are in place instead of letting some PAC dictate what happens? You let one PAC dictate what happens and then they are all going to want to. Why waste our time if Cruz doesn’t make it to the top two?

[Mad Dawgg]

If Trump and Cruz made a deal and decided to Run as a team the GOPe and the Media would implode. I would pay good money to see that.

[Lopeover]

Any other person with Trumps lead, the party would be coalescing around him. There would be no more debates.

[chicagolady]

OH BULL $$HIT! There have been plenty of debates.

If you don’t know were they stand folks you are stupid OR BRAIN DEAD!

[The_Republic_Of_Maine]

With both hooked up to lie detectors.

[Heart-Rest]

Since Cruz was clobbered, and only managed to come in third in South Carolina, and Rubio came in second, Rubio would declare that he has a more valid claim to debating the #1 candidate, Trump, one-on-one.  

It is understandable why Cruz would desperately want to have a one-on-one with the big winner Trump, but it is truly a terrible idea emanating from the loser's camp, as they are trying to change the rules in the middle of the game, just because they got royally schlonged by the magnificent voters of South Carolina.