Objectively, I do not have a problem with Trump’s spending or buying if you will. Money equals free speech in my book. PACs give the little guy with little money a voice, so I do not buy into the argument that only the rich have a voice via money.
What needs to be examined is what, if anything did Trump get in return for his donations. I am no fan of crony capitalism, but given the sums involved it does not smell too badly for Trump; especially when compared to other businessmen/billionaires.
Hard to see how it wouldn't be all over the place if anyone had any dirt on him from his contributions. But, alas, some will ignore other harsh realities in order to pick at scabs to try to find if some "possibilities" might come true....