[lifeofgrace]

Content aside, regardless of what you're saying, whether you're right or wrong or otherwise, that's the very definition of trolling. Intentionally provoking a rise out of this crew is like checking your gasoline tank with a match. Best of luck with that. :-)

It would be trolling if I didn't regularly post content to FR for the last year or two. If I didn't financially support the site, and engage in constructive conversations here.

But I do.

So I call this challenging the prevailing thought here. I am unabashedly a Republican who believes in Federalist principles. Sometimes they work really well with libertarian principles, and sometimes they do not.

[Hugh the Scot]

Nevertheless the post is filled with unsupported assertions which display the author’s biases without providing any evidence that they are an accurate reflection of Paul’s policy positions. .

In other words : pure opinion.

[dayglored]

Hi again. FWIW I didn't mean my remark about trolling pejoratively.

I respect your willingness to support the site (I likewise do so, monthly) and join in the conversations (as I do). Just that your phrase about expecting FR folks to get angry struck me as sort of "asking for somebody to oblige" which is often the start of a flamewar or even a zot.

But from the looks of things on the thread, it's fine. FReeper 'simon says what' seems to be the only one taking heat. ;-)

Have a great day!