To: Svartalfiar
Plus, despite what the author and many other scribblers say, he has a better than average shot at the White House. They’re not using up all these man hours writing about someone with no chance at winning, believe me.
9 posted on
04/28/2015 10:10:45 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bloomberg name is on it,so disregard.
10 posted on
04/28/2015 10:11:40 AM PDT by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Theyre not using up all these man hours writing about someone with no chance at winning, believe me.
Exactly. As much as they try to ignore him, I don't see nearly as many articles about Carson or Graham or Perry or Santorum or Huckster, all of whole have "the same" or even a "better" chance of winning the nomination. Supposedly. Even Rubio and Walker aren't nearly as widespread in the news as Cruz is.
But, once we get to the debates, it'll be over. Rubio won't have legs to stand on, Bush will likely be gone by then, and while Walker is decent, he just doesn't have the same passion and smoothness that Cruz does. And I'm pretty sure he uses notes :p
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson