Posted on 12/15/2014 10:16:53 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
I have been watching Democrat Underground for years. They’ve been pushing her for a long time.
I’ve been saying it will not be Hillary; it will be Warren.
I would say that Hillary is more like their Dole, or something, rather than their Romney.
Hillary is a lifelong democrat and long time democrat politician, Romney registered republican in October of 1993, won a single election in 2002, and became the party’s nominee in 2012, almost coming out of no where, with no known constituency, no real political convictions that fit the GOP, with a failed single term in office, and it still remains a mystery to how he figures in so largely into the GOP.
It might be Warren...but if you were to travel around the south and attempt to promote Warren...you’d find very little interest. If you look at her resume...the only things of achievement are professor via Harvard, some business and banking law expert but never in actual business or an actual bank, and two brief years as a Senator (try avoiding the Obama ID).
Her speeches are mostly all two-star. She might occasionally be clever but she has no executive experience (either in business, or as a governor). You’d basically get Obama version 2.0.
I think Hillary and Lie-a-watha will be on the same ticket. Hillary will attract the moderate democrats and Lie-a-watha will attract the far left. Hillary will perform a juggling act to keep both camps on task.
Republicans need to start picking the liberal nominee like the Democrats do for conservatives.
Start fawning over someone you thin will have no chance in the general election and act like even you might vote Dem if that charmer was the nominee. Then once he/she gets the nod — laugh at the carnage.
Taken from the repeat liberal playbook.
I guess Warren is better at conning single female voters than Hillary is.. She’s probably just as good at it as 0bama was in 2008. Paging Sandra Fluke, it’s 2008 mass hypnosis all over again!
I post there, too, FRiend. Lots of jollies to be had!
Elizabeth Warren as Commander-In-Chief up against Islamism? I think I’m gonna vomit.
All true, but none it matters to dummycrats.
She's also a frump, a bad speaker, a worse debater, and not quick on her feet. I hope they nominate her.
Jayzus. Each of them alone make me want to bleach my eyes when I look at them. I shudder to think we’d get that sort of ugly in STEREO.
The last Masshole elitist America voted for was JFK. Yes, the more I think about it the more I hope Granny Warren takes a shot at the cup. She'll get shellacked by Cruz.
Wendy Davis on a national level
> Hillary is a lifelong democrat...
She was an active (young) Republican until 1968. Granted that her adult life she's been a Dem.
More interestingly, Elizabeth Warren was a Republican until 1996, when she switched to Dem. That's a lot more recent.
Compared to the Hildebeest, Fauxcahontas, of cheese shop fame, comes off +1 on all the points you cite. Therefore, you may get your wish!
yeah, Warren is their Cruz. She probably sucks more than Hillary if such a thing is possible.
Right, I was saved by the “adult” voting age part, but I did temporarily forget that little nugget about her having been a Goldwater girl.
That is interesting about Warren, and I didn’t bother to mention that Romney was a republican before leaving the party in 1979, because I kind of figured that people knew that he had been born into the party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.