He can't even bring himself to mention her name. Or did I miss it somehow?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney prevailing over seemingly less electable candidates. Romney was unelectable. Liberal republicans are unelectable as president. History shows that clearly.
Supporting liberal republican candidates for the presidency just makes the GOP run more liberal candidates.
It's time for all liberal republicans to be politically destroyed, and for them to never win again, in the primary or the general, until running as a liberal republican is seen as a kiss of death for a political career.
/johnny
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But a Republican Party that goes beyond being transfixed by arguments about the past has a chance to search, cooperatively and with respectful disagreement along the way, for policies that address genuine problems in line with conservative principles Pipe dream. The Republican Party wants conservatives at the back of the bus where they belong.
3 posted on
09/08/2014 4:36:05 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Republicans aren’t going to win the Senate and they’ll lose House seats.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Republican Party is like a drunkard pastor. It’s capable of saying all the right things but has no intentions of doing the right thing. It, like the pastor, needs to make a fundamental change and reacquaint itself with basic truths. I’m not hopeful.
13 posted on
09/08/2014 5:46:09 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fictional)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When you have a rush of hundreds of thousands of previously uninvolved people into electoral politics, you get a certain number of wackos, weirdos and witches.
That's exactly right. It takes time to sort things out. The Tea Party advanced far further, far faster than the Progtards ever dreamed of doing and it scares them to death. The amnesty bum rush is a direct result of that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson