“Scott Walker. The Conservative superstar of the year.”
A man with a decent resume, and already vetted by the dems via a vicious recall and does well in a blue state.
An excellent choice except, first time presidential candidates usually get beaten up the first time out. It is the second time around that they win the nomination.
Santorum and Romney both have large national organizations left over from 2012 and large fund raising lists to call. They have name recognition and both won Iowa sort of and both did well in NH. Either or both will be very tough opponents.
Not always. If you look at the last 6 decades, in 1952, Eisenhower & Stevenson got their nominations on the first try. Ditto 1960 with Nixon & Kennedy. Although Goldwater had floated his name in 1960, he got the nomination on his first actual try in 1964. Humphrey got it on the second try in 1968 (but Nixon's was the second official nomination). McGovern got his on the first try in 1972, as did Carter in 1976. Reagan, like Humphrey, got his on the second try in 1980. Mondale & Dukakis on their first tries in 1984 & 1988. GHW Bush on his second try in 1988 (after first running in 1980). Clinton got in on his first try in 1992. Dole, lamentably, had to go through three tries to get it by 1996 (having tried before in 1980 & 1988). Dubya got it on a first try in 2000. Gore on his second (having tried back in 1988) the same year. Kerry & Obama both on their first tries in 2004 & 2008. McCain & Willard on their seconds in 2008 & 2012.
So, with the lone exception of Reagan, running retreads has been a fiasco for us, and hasn't worked since 1988 (and GHW Bush proceeded to undo what Reagan had done, paving the way for Clinton). Running first-time candidates on the Dem side has been a winner for them since 1976, and worked for us the last time we won an open race in 2000.
"Santorum and Romney both have large national organizations left over from 2012 and large fund raising lists to call. They have name recognition and both won Iowa sort of and both did well in NH. Either or both will be very tough opponents."
Willard should be a non-starter. That he would be attempting a third run, as Bob Dole did (or William Jennings Bryan, for that matter), is as gross an example of deliberately wanting the party to lose as can be. Santorum is NOT a strong candidate. He was second tier to start off with. Why he performed well was because he was the only thing remotely resembling a Conservative candidate, hence he was the fallback for many of us.
Of course, even as second-tier as he was, he had far more experience than Zero, who was barely out of the IL state legislature, where he was a virtual non-entity with nothing in the way of accomplishments (and successfully running two stronger opponents off the ballot). Indeed, to date, the ONLY strong candidate Zero has ever faced was Congressman Bobby Rush, who destroyed him when he tried to beat Rush in the Dem primary for Congress in 2000. That race was a premier example that Zero has always been eminently defeatable, so long as one ran a candidate who actually was credible and WANTED to beat him and not lose gracefully to him (hence a sacrificial lamb with no resources in 2004, Alan Keyes, or the two ringers of McCain and Willard).
Excellent point. But as wonderful as Scott Walker may be, and he has indeed been a magnificent Governor, I can't see how a candidate in our current society, with the emphasis on education beyond the college level and the current Liberal press, is elected to president without a college diploma even on the second try.