I think he needs to define himself somehow on this issue.
I would say I believe in marriage being between a man and a woman but I would also say that changing marriage definitions is just the beginning.
The proponents of gay marriage are demonizing those opposing gay marriage (as Justice Scalia noted in his dissent on last year’s DOMA case) and are already silencing them using boycott tactics and labeling them “bigots” to shut down their business operations or causing them to lose their jobs.
This isn’t ultimately about the definition of marriage, it is an ever increasing and never ending attack on the Constitution designed to deny First Amendment rights of free speech and religion to Americans who disapprove of homosexuality and or gay marriage.
Yes, all of what you posted is exactly why I insist that homosexuality be criminalized. The problem with legalizing homosexuality is that doing so gives it some measure of social acceptance _ and giving criminals and deviants even a little social acceptance will lead to them abusing it and demanding that the rest of society accept it at gunpoint.
Also, Walker’s appeal to the US Supreme Court is tacit support of gay marriage _ any ruling would be either 5-4 or 6-3 in favor of gay marriage. I’m not sure how Roberts would vote _ he started off as a voice of reason, but seems to realize that there’s a lot more prestige and money in backing moonbat political positions. Kennedy (I think he’s libertarian) was the main author of the Lawrence v. Texas decision, and the other 4 liberal justices are obvious traitors with every choice they make.