Replies

She won't pull the voters away from hillary. It would be an acknowledgement that the next pres will be a woman, so the majority thinking will be it might as well be hillary.

I don't follow your reasoning on this, but to repeat, "a qualified female candidate who will challenge her on these issues and run an error free campaign." If we can get a candidate who can give us both, we might have a chance.

hillary's a crone who has not aged well. The best counter is someone younger, intelligent, and established who appeals to youthful votes. I'd think Ted Cruz would be the best one to run against hillary,

Hillary would have to really blow it to lose to Cruz. But then again, in 2008 she proved she was at least capable of doing that.

at least among those who we're considering now. But someone might emerge from the Benghazi committee.

Maybe, we're still two years away.

If any woman is chosen by the 'pubs, hillary's (failed) experiences make her the more qualified candidate. It's a dumb time not to choose the most qualified, articulate, conservative white (including Hispanics) male there is.

Racist? No....it's practical. People have "hope and change" fatigue. If the 'pubs choose a guy who could be perceived as Putin's equal in skill as a leader, that would be powerful.