That's because you have good internal instincts and radar…..and I hope your radar has made the same sounds when Ricky Santuckabee appears on your screen as well……same thing, different sweater vest is all…..
>>> and I hope your radar has made the same sounds when Ricky Santuckabee appears on your screen as well
not familiar with this guy... we’ve had no cable tv for over 3 years.
You got that one right, CEW. But there will be those who say that rejecting Santorum is engaging in "circular firing squad" behavior. Funny how in this so-called "circular" arrangement, limited government conservatives pretty much all aim at the same guys, like Santorum, who has voted to increase minimum wage many times, refused to cut food stamps, wanted to stop tax money for abortion-friendly Planned Parenthood (good!) but instead of returning that money to individual taxpayers to spend as they please, advocated to keep the tax funding in place but spend it instead on adoption programs because you KNOW the government has to get involved!!!!!! (bad).
The thing that disgusted me most about Santorum was his constant "family values" gimmick. Smarmy, phony, feel-good Hallmark Channel "family values" empty saccarine. As if people who didn't have big families were second-class citizens. Appealing on "family values" is as divisive and phony as appealing on ethnic or racial grounds. Good, righteous values are good and righteous whether being practiced in "families" or not. And if "good family values" lead to prosperity (which Santorum claimed on his website during the 2012 primaries), then Mexico, where family is about the most important thing to the people there, would be much more prosperous than it is.
Santorum is every bit as lame as Huck, you are correct.