Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Website won’t be fixed by December 1 (Democrats fear the Senate has been lost)
Hot Air ^ | November 26, 2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 11/26/2013 7:26:44 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Old and busted: Healthcare.gov will be fully operational by November 30th. New hotness: Healthcare.gov will, er, work better than it did by December 1!

Brought to you by the same people who insisted that if you liked your insurance plan, you could keep it:

Obama administration officials said Monday that some visitors to HealthCare.gov will experience outages, slow response times or try-again-later messages in December.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) delivered the message in the latest attempt to downplay expectations for Nov. 30, the administration’s self-imposed deadline for fixing ObamaCare’s federal enrollment site.

CMS spokeswoman Julie Bataille said errors that persist past this weekend would be “intermittent” and, in line with a promise made by the White House, would not affect the vast majority of the site’s users.

But Bataille acknowledged that some would still experience “periods of suboptimal performance” by the system due to either heavy traffic or technical issues that are still being addressed.

“The system will not work perfectly on Dec. 1, but it will work much better than it did in October,” Bataille said.

Speaking of suboptimal performance …

The comments came after HealthCare.gov experienced an unscheduled outage on Monday for one hour. The CMS had recently touted the site for not randomly crashing. Bataille said the problem was remedied quickly by the site’s tech team.

Let’s recall that the pledge last month was specifically that Healthcare.gov would be “fully functional” by December 1. That date was not an accident. In order to have coverage by January 1, enrollees have to complete their enrollment by mid-December, although the administration is trying to get insurers to wait until December 23rd rather than the 15th as the cutoff. If the web portal still can’t handle the enrollments properly and fully by that time — and the 834s to the insurers seem to still be a big problem in that regard:

Behind the scenes, when an individual selects a plan, the federal system transmits a file, known as an “834,” with all of the relevant information about that individual and his or her plan selection.

These files have been plagued by errors, from spouses and children being mixed up to enrollments being duplicated or inadvertently cancelled. According to HHS, they have “completed fixes for two-thirds of the high-priority bugs that our tech team working with issuers identified as being responsible for the issues with 834 transactions and other issuer priorities.”

But according to an insurance industry source, though the 834 problems are getting better, there is still a long way to go. Insurers still haven’t reached the point where they can feel confident that the data is reliable.

As a result, though they have been able to process some payments from individuals, they’ve only been able to do so on piecemeal basis in cases where they are fully confident in the data, often because it’s been verified by hand.

That’s another problem. If the front end starts working better, the deluge of last-minute enrollments to comply with the individual mandate will flood insurers with bad data, which will be impossible to fix by hand in that level of throughput. Let’s also not forget that the subsidy-payment system doesn’t exist yet, either. This announcement only relates to the consumer experience of Healthcare.gov, not the full functionality. Without the subsidy payments to the insurers, there’s still a large question as to whether those subsidy-qualifying enrollees will actually have coverage on January 1 if insurers don’t get the full premiums in hand by December 31st, a deadline which now looks impossible to meet.

Democrats pinned their hopes of competing in the 2014 midterms on the Obama administration’s ability to deliver on this pledge. Now they’re beginning to realize that they’ve hitched their wagons to a failing star:

For Democrats, the politics of the health care law are creating a death spiral of their own. For the White House to protect its signature initiative, it needs to maintain a Democratic Senate majority past 2015. But to do so, Majority Leader Harry Reid needs to insulate vulnerable battleground-state Democrats, who are all too eager to propose their own fixes to the law that may be politically satisfying, but could undermine the fundamentals of the law.

Race-by-race polling conducted over the last month has painted a grim picture of the difficult environment Senate Democrats are facing next year. In Louisiana, a new state survey showed Landrieu’s approval rating is now underwater; she tallied only 41 percent of the vote against her GOP opposition. In Arkansas, where advertising on the health care law began early, Sen. Mark Pryor’s approval sank to 33 percent, a drop of 18 points since last year. A new Quinnipiac survey showed Sen. Mark Udall of Colorado, who looked like a lock for reelection last month, in a dead heat against little-known GOP opponents. Even a Democratic automated poll from Public Policy Polling showed Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina running neck-and-neck against Republican opposition, with her job disapproval spiking over the last two months. These are the types of numbers that wave elections are made of.

The big picture isn’t any better: The president’s approval rating, which historically correlates with his party’s midterm performance, has dipped below 40 percent in several national surveys. Democrats saw their nine-point lead on the generic ballot in the Quinnipiac survey evaporate in a month, and a CNN/ORC poll released today shows Republicans now holding a two-point lead.

“You want to prevent your race from being about Obamacare. If you enable your race to be about Obamacare, you’re making a mistake,” said Democratic pollster Mark Mellman, who’s working for Landrieu. “You need to explain what you’re trying to fix, and you better be trying to fix something. If there’s nothing you want to fix, there’s something wrong with you. At this point, it’s hard to defend the benefits, but you can say we’re not going back to the evils of the old system.”

In the old system, 85% of Americans had health insurance, and 87% were satisfied with their health care. Good luck trying to run on the “evils” of that system, especially after getting an up-close-and-personal look at DemocratCare.


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; Polls; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2014; democrats; imshocked; obama; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet; a fool in paradise
I perdicted that!


41 posted on 11/26/2013 9:46:05 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This was so “unexpected” . . . NOT.

Barry “BS Bomber” Obama still keeps lying and lying and lying like the one trick pony he is. Even the MSM can't save him now as THEY lose their health care! ObamaCare bites its supporters in the butt. Priceless.

42 posted on 11/26/2013 9:57:32 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nope, won’t happen. Too much voter fraud and low information voters keeping the hand outs acomin.


43 posted on 11/26/2013 10:07:08 PM PST by Conservative4Ever (A pox on the House of Apple and the ios7 horse they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am hoping impeachment proceedings can start in Jan2015 for ObamaCare fraud, for starters.


44 posted on 11/26/2013 10:16:05 PM PST by IAGeezer912 (One out of every 20 people on the face of the earth are Americans. We have won life's lottery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAGeezer912

Impeached? He could massacre a troop of girl scouts by beheading them on the White House lawn during the Easter Egg roll, butcher them, barbecue them and serve them to all the participants and he still wouldn’t be impeached. And if you criticized him about it, the press would say “it’s a black thing” and accuse you of being a racist tea bagging rethuglican for bringing it up while licking their fingers and asking Michelle what kind of spice rub they’re using and politely request more macaroni & cheese and a refill of their kool-aid.


45 posted on 11/26/2013 10:19:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

46 posted on 11/27/2013 12:46:47 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (I'm not afraid to say what i mean nor should you be afraid of what you know to be true !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama proudly repeated to the press the command he gave to the huddled bureaucrats: "The website SHALL be fixed by December 1." A real executive knows this is a useless command. The bureaucrats would have gladly had it working by October 1, if it had been within their power to make it happen. It clearly wasn't.

What a real executive says is: "December 1 is a critical date. What can I do to help you remove obstacles to meeting that date." Obama is not an effective leader, he is an ineffective bully.

47 posted on 11/27/2013 4:19:07 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; GeronL

Waiting for the headline “OBAMA TELLS TRUTH!”


48 posted on 11/27/2013 4:53:08 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; Daffynition; Lucky9teen; GeronL; Slings and Arrows

49 posted on 11/27/2013 4:55:34 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Rather shocking revelation, wouldn't you say old chap?


50 posted on 11/27/2013 4:57:32 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In the old system, 85% of Americans had health insurance, and 87% were satisfied with their health care. Good luck trying to run on the “evils” of that system, especially after getting an up-close-and-personal look at DemocratCare.

Democrats run from this point.

51 posted on 11/27/2013 5:02:14 AM PST by The Mayor (Honesty means never having to look over your shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
DIMocRATs only voted for this Freedom-killing obamanation. They should take it up the *** sans lube.
52 posted on 11/27/2013 5:18:30 AM PST by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
We've got our best techies on it.


53 posted on 11/27/2013 5:28:48 AM PST by Daffynition (*$17,000,000,000,000* Fear the beards! GO SOX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They're working on it. Please be patient.


54 posted on 11/27/2013 5:42:15 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radiohead
Can someone tell me how the subsidies work? Do you get a check every month? Every year? How do you compel people to use the money for insurance? Does it only exists on paper?

The subsidies are called "tax credits". If you income is low enough to qualify for $100 per month of tax credit on your $400 premium you pay $300 to your insurance company each month and the Federal Government pays $100 to your insurance company each month. It's all organized through the website portal, and that part of it (payments from the government to the insurance company) is not only not working, the code isn't yet written.

55 posted on 11/27/2013 7:01:32 AM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

omg that is funny


56 posted on 11/27/2013 8:36:09 AM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jespasinthru
There was an item posted yesterday from PJ Media--an article by David Steinberg entitled "Rigging the Future." He shows how the website is set up to create voter databases for the Democrats to use...as well as to enroll new Medicaid recipients in a way that bypasses the states' ability to screen out people who are not eligible for Medicaid.

The longer the website doesn't work, the fewer people in the database...but it makes sense that Obama and the Democrats don't want to change those features of the sign-up process.

57 posted on 11/27/2013 9:07:39 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson