Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: The impact of endorsements (McCain to endorse Hillary instead of Rand Paul?)
Hot Air ^ | September 13, 2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 09/14/2013 7:13:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Allahpundit asked an interesting exit question at the end of his post on John McCain’s possible retirement:

Exit question for righties who think a McCain endorsement of Hillary over Paul would mean nothing to anyone: You sure?

Actually, yeah, I’m pretty sure it won’t mean anything, but not because of McCain’s relative draw within the GOP or with independents. I just don’t think endorsements at this level have any impact on the fortunes of candidates with near-total saturation with voters already. Endorsements matter for obscure candidates, perhaps especially in local elections, but also in House and Senate races for newcomers. A well-placed endorsement will allow those candidates to become defined by their associations until they can establish their own identities.

On the presidential level, though, the endorsements are much more about the endorser than the candidate. People already know Hillary Clinton — perhaps too much at this stage. They don’t need John McCain’s endorsement to unravel the mystery for them. The same will be true for all of the realistic front-runners for the party nominations in 2016, too. Endorsements are a way to assign political figures to a team and to raise money, but very few people will back Scott Walker or Mike Pence (to use other potential examples) because a Senator from either party lines up with them.


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016endorsements; collaborator; hillary; hillary2016; mccain; rand2016; randpaul; randsconcerntrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

The “old son-of-a-b!tch” (as he’s known affectionately around my house) has never been a maverick. He’s a renegade.


21 posted on 09/15/2013 5:22:52 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bogus story. Paul wont get the nom.


22 posted on 09/15/2013 5:36:51 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hell, I am not surprised, didn’t he support Obama over McCain in 2008?


23 posted on 09/15/2013 7:32:39 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: make no mistake

Benghazi Hitlery would seem appropriate as well.


24 posted on 09/15/2013 8:50:31 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Benghazi Hitlery would seem appropriate as well.

Thank you. Benghazi Hitlery is a perfect name for her

25 posted on 09/15/2013 6:33:51 PM PDT by make no mistake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson