I gave you the straightest, most honest answer conceivable.
I even stretched to try and come up with some thoughts on an issue I frankly have not thought very much about.
Have I thought about the meaning of “natural born citizen” as understood by our Founders, Framers and legal experts throughout history? Absolutely.
Have I thought about what qualifications I would personally assign to the job? Not very much. I’m not in the business of second-guessing the Founding Fathers. I’m more in the business of supporting what they did, because for the most part, it has worked and worked well.
If you can’t accept an honest and straightforward answer, that’s your problem.
And you chose to believe the most Liberal possible interpretation of it, and in spite of quite a lot of evidence against it.
Can the lawyer-speak. You still didn't answer the question.
Jeff, you're a transparent fraud. You absolutely refuse to answer the one simple question that lies at the heart of this entire discussion. The one thing that no amount of copy/pasta and lawyer-like dancing can overcome.
As I predicted, you've invested far too much in the defense of your position to allow yourself to be cornered into a place you can't escape from, so you've chosen the coward's way out.
By doing so, you've now proven that your whole argument rests on thin air, and is ultimately indefensible because simple logic and reason do not support it.
I'm done with you, Jeff. You're obviously obsessed with being right in an internet argument, and really have no other purpose for continuing this exchange.
Finis