No, he's not. He's cutting and pasting walls of text to bludgeon others with. That's not 'arguing' by any means.
So what would you have him do? He’s claimed pretty clearly, as far as I can see, that ‘natural born citizen’ does not and never did require two citizen parents. (Do you agree that that’s his point?) In support of that fairly focused point, he’s provided cites from historical sources. (It may look like a bludgeoning wall of text to you, but that’s not his problem.) That all looks like ‘arguing’ to me.