For starters, there would be no tax increase on successful entrepreneurs.
There would be no push to cut military.
Obamacare would be history.
If you can’t see the difference on just those 3 issues between Obama & Romney, I am afraid you are beyond hopeless.
Really, I thought tax rates were a matter of tax-law, and therefore their alteration properly belongs to congress: how then could Romney alter thir tax-rate?
There would be no push to cut military.
Irrelevant -- most of the military needs to be cut, though not for the popular reasons put forth but because: the constitution does not authorize an Air Force, and the regular Army would horrify the founding fathers (why else did they Constitutionally limit the appropriation of funds for the army to 2-years?).
Obamacare would be history.
The President cannot overturn/repeal some law. Moreover, the "exemption voucher" idea that was floated by his supporters, if not him exactly, would provide a way for the President to extort the several States -- "Do what I want or I'll revoke your exemption!" -- thereby further weakening state sovereignty.
If you can’t see the difference on just those 3 issues between Obama & Romney, I am afraid you are beyond hopeless.
Two out of the three points were simply not within the realm of the President's authority. -- So, I reiterate: how would a Romney presidency be different?