Posted on 11/09/2012 5:24:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
It’s been less than 24 hours since the polls closed and already the first shots in an emerging civil war within the conservative movement are being fired. Right-leaning pundits have been taking turns beating up on Mitt Romney and blaming him for the loss last night. Donald Trump just tweeted, “Congrats to @KarlRove on blowing $400 million this cycle. Every race @CrossroadsGPS ran ads in, the Republicans lost. What a waste of money.” And GOP leaders are already taking to the barricades on either side of the divide, which basically comes down to this question: Were Romney and the GOP too conservative or not conservative enough?
Steve Schmidt, a top Republican strategist who ran John McCain’s 2008 campaign, invoked the term on MSNBC this morning. “When I talk about a civil war in the Republican Party, what I mean is, it’s time for Republican elected leaders to stand up and to repudiate this nonsense [of the extreme right wing], and to repudiate it directly,” he said.
But on the other side of the fight, Herman Cain, the former presidential candidate who still has a robust following via his popular talk radio program and speaking tours, today suggested the most clear step to open civil war: secession. Appearing on Bryan Fischer’s radio program this afternoon, Cain called for a large faction of Republican Party leaders to desert the party and form a third, more conservative party.
“I never thought that I would say this, and this is the first time publicly that I’ve said it: We need a third party to save this country. Not Ron Paul and the Ron Paulites. No. We need a legitimate third party to challenge the current system that we have, because I don’t believe that the Republican Party … has the ability to rebrand itself,” Cain said.
Fischer, a social conservative leader, noted that he predicted this summer that if Mitt Romney loses, evangelical conservatives would start a third party. “If Barack Obama wins this election the Republican Party as we know it is finished, it is dead, it is toast,” Fischer said in September at the Values Voter Summit in Washington.
Rush Limabugh, two months ago, echoed the sentiment. ”If Obama wins, let me tell you what it’s the end of: the Republican Party. There’s gonna be a third party that’s gonna be oriented toward conservatism,” he said.
“It is more viable today than it has ever been,” Cain told Fischer today of a third party.
After the GOP’s crushing 2008 loss, there was lots of talk about a new third party. When the Tea Party emerged, this talk almost became a reality. Instead, the conservative activists opted for a hostile takeover of the GOP. It’s still very unlikely that Cain or anyone else could start a viable third party, but his comments underscore the cleavage within the conservative movement in the wake of the defeat last night.
LOL, Herman Cain has become quite a clown.
There are already a bunch of dopey 3rd party’s and they aren’t ever going to amount to squat. It’s just not going to happen.
Agreed. With some early successes early on, I think it can work. What did Perot pull in, 20%. I think we could get somewhere around a 30/30/30 split.
I would join in a minute.
Romney lost because he was a liberal and the liberal RINO’s picked him.
I am hearing talk of the RINO’s wanting to recruit by buying votes like the Democrats do.That is not my party.
Perot proved with an essentially unlimited budget you can get 20% nationally - and elect Dems with a Clintonian plurality.
If there is to be a new Party, here is how it happens, the Texas GOP pulls out of the National Party, and other State delegations join them to create a new movement, I believe that is the only viable way to start a new Party.
Have to get rid of the Electoral College for that to work.
Yup. If they do it thoughtfully and strategically, it could grow over time.
Possible, or there may be a new party any number of ways.
Bring it.
What matters is it starts now. Now.
Now.
It should be a registered party, that supports Conservative Republicans in each race, if there is no conservative Republican running - we don’t vote in that race, we skip that candidate. This is the only they will learn without actually jeopardizing the whole country.
Kind of like what happened in 2010, except an organized, registered Tea Party.
I agree.
And for all the chumps who keep pulling the “R” lever and then venting after every election where the GOP pulls a Lucy Van Pelt on conservatives, well, you’re chumps and you’ll likely always be chumps, because you’re not learning the obvious lesson being laid out in front of you.
The way to start a new party is at a state or regional level, and then start picking off everything we can get, from county commissioners to House seats. This can be done and it can be done on a fairly limited budget.
Once enough seats in the House are taken that the GOP has to deal with a third party in Congress, then the GOP can be given an ultimatum.
For those who think that a new political party can’t arise: Tell that to the Whigs.
The fact is, we’re broke as a nation. We have two spendthrift political parties in power and both of them are liars when they say they’ll cut spending. Anyone who knows even basic mathematics can see that the problem with the federal budget (and state budgets) is on the spending side. That the GOP cannot find one program to eliminate completely - zero out the budget, eliminate the employees, sell off the buildings that house them - is an indication that they’ll never be serious about cutting spending.
The debt and spending issue is as big or bigger than the slavery issue of the 1800’s. It is an issue that will define who we are as a nation for decades and decades to come. It is an issue with financial as well as moral/ethical ramifications, just as slavery was.
Only for the presidential race.
For Congress, state and local races, the EC matters not a whit.
And most spending issues are decided at levels much lower than the POTUS or EOP.
Ditto.
Conservatism is our last best hope while the GOP will continue moving left compounding their failure. They are doomed
DOA.
I have spent yers as a Libertarian Party activist. The biggest expenditure we always encountered in presidential election years was access to the ballot. The elstablishment parties have monopolized the ballot with requirements for the number of petition signatures, regulated periods in which we were allowed to gather those signatures, and the inevitable challenges we faced when we finally had more than enough to deliver to the state agencies that ruled over these things. Every time we achieved so-called “permanent ballot status”, the legislators would simply change the rules and we would have to start all over again. The sheeple are absolutely no help whatsoever. You could appeal to their sense of fairness, asking them if they would prefer another choice on their ballot and the majority of them would simply cower at the idea. It was the most frustrating thing I had ever been involved in politically. I just could not believe the level of brainwashing these people displayed. The idea of having a CHOICE on the ballot was simply beyond their comprehension. Some of them even believed that the Constitution had established the two-party system. Unbelievable.
Yup. 3rd party's fail utterly in the United States. We hear this nonsense about forming new ones around election time every year and nothing is going to come of it. Our winner take all system with no possibility of coalition government is just not suited for 3rd party's.
Bunk.
Things are different, and things are broken.
We need a new approach.
A 3rd party will occur the day after Texas withdraws from the union.
And all my hair grows back.
It’s sublimation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.