[so_real]

But that is 10X better than the Marxist we have now. Or do you disagree?

As a person, a human being, I think he's 10X better than Obama. As an individual acting the role of POTUS, I think he'll be slightly more Constitutional than Obama. As the figurehead of the ship we call "Conservatism in America", he's 50X more damaging than Obama. Even if we "win" this battle, we "lose" in that the war effort is set back. I sincerely believe electing Romney, and thereby defining contemporary conservatism in his sway, is more damaging to our movement than staying organized and focused on battling Obama positions. As Obama pushes hard left, the history books will record that he was slapped down for it, and hopefully impeached or arrested. As Romney pushes left, even if not hard, the history books will record that Republicans were the pro-abortion party, the pro-homosexual party, the pro-illegal-immigration party, the pro-stimulus-economy party, etc, etc, etc. That's a strategic mistake.

[Finny]

I sincerely believe electing Romney, and thereby defining contemporary conservatism in his sway, is more damaging to our movement than staying organized and focused on battling Obama positions.

I am right there with you, Bro. FReeper.

As Obama pushes hard left, the history books will record that he was slapped down for it, and hopefully impeached or arrested. As Romney pushes left, even if not hard, the history books will record that Republicans were the pro-abortion party, the pro-homosexual party, the pro-illegal-immigration party, the pro-stimulus-economy party, etc, etc, etc. That's a strategic mistake.

Your call is SPOT ON.