Rick Perry betrays the right, stays in

The Hill ^ | January 4, 2012 | Brent Budowsky

[2ndDivisionVet]

If Rick Perry was a legitimate conservative (which I always warned he was not) he would have dropped out of the campaign today and endorsed Rick Santorum, Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich. Yet "Pay-for-Play" Perry stays in, and heads for South Carolina. So what's the deal?

The big winner of Perry staying in, by far, is Mitt Romney. The big loser is the conservative movement and the candidates who appeal to that movement. Keeping in mind my long-held view that Perry is not conservative, just a "pay-for-play" guy, what is in it for Perry?

1. Perhaps Romney offered Perry a position in his administration, such as undersecretary of Agriculture.

2. Perhaps Romney offered Perry a diplomatic post suited to his talents, such as United States Ambassador to Bolivia.

3. Perhaps Perry spent more of his money than we realize, and Romney offered to go to his 1 percent wealthy fundraisers and raise for Perry a little more dough to sweeten the pie.

Who knows? I would suggest that by staying in and helping Romney, and hurting Santorum and Gingrich, Perry is to the conservative movement what Benedict Arnold was to the colonists. Or, since Rick Perry likes analogies from the Bible, perhaps a gentleman whose first name begins with "J" and ends with "-udas" fairly describes what Perry is doing to the real conservatives today.

[Alamo-Girl]

As a San Antonio girl, "no surrender, no retreat, remember the Alamo" is my motto.

So, Lord willing, I will stay with Perry until he wins, loses or withdraws.

[naxetevitan]

Go take a look at that website’s map for the 2000 election and read their “Election Facts.” It says “Impeachment” and “Presidential ethics.” That SHOULD be listed on the previous election of 1996, under clinton. Wonder if they did that on purpose.