Posted on 12/28/2011 6:18:33 PM PST by TBBT
That or to get more seniority and responsibility in the House.
There is something fishy here. Nobody who would honestly and ethically work for a conservative like her could so easily turn traitor and endorse that racist nutcase unless there is much more to the story.
Holy Cow
Via Twitter:
@allahpundit
Allah Pundit !! RT @mpoindc:
Bachmann statement: “Sorenson personally told me he was offered a large sum of money to go to work for the Paul campaign.”
Could be that she’s a catty little b___h.
Or that she speaks like a droning kindergarten teacher.
Or that she has spent more time attacking Republicans than Obama.
Or that she stretches the truth.
Or that she tries to make someone with a 98.5% pro life record look pro choice.
Or that she’s just a short term congresswoman running for Pres.
Or that she tried to make Rick Perry look like Joseph Mengele.
Or that she has that deer in the headlights expression.
And so on....
LOL!!!!!
Maybe Ken overheard at the dentist that Michele is endorsing Willard again right after the caucus?
Did you say "honestly and ethically?" That's presenting facts not in evidence.
Boy, you are really big into conspiracy theories tonight. I think both Newt and Mitt suck, so by your reasoning, I am working to support Romney.
I hate to burst your bubble, but your boy Newt is rapidly moving toward second-tier status.
If true, she is a outright liar and this wouldnt prove to be the first time
Supporting Paul over Mitt is a smart move, anyone but an idiot knows that Paul will never be the nominee, but if he can hurt Mittins then maybe it will give the Real Conservatives a leg up.
I thik we will have to rename this GOP election season and effort;
SHIP OF FOOLS!
Except for the matter that it paints the entire party as wacky by giving a loon like Paul validity.
Ouch. You know you are having a bad day when your SuperPac announces they are supporting one of your opponents, and your campaign co-chair endorses another opponent.
I liked Michelle, and at one time hoped she could make herself into a good nominee, but isn’t it time for her to realize that all the wishing in the world won’t make her a serious candidate?
At least Rick Santorum TRIED to collect signatures for Virginia.
Well if you can keep FOX and the alphabet news groups from promoting him as a republican then I guess we would look less foolish, but they are all in the Mittins camp so it is in their self interest to promote the fool.
By the way, conservatives look like fools to all the above in case you don’t know.
Could be. Or, could be only true in Iowa and therefore not an issue. He still looks very strong in SC and Florida and National polls. Only Iowa and the internet junkies are getting bombed by all the negativity against him. Not the whole country. Then there is this: if Newt goes down, Mitt wins unless there is somehow a Perry miracle. Period. Santorum and Bachmann are jumping the shark in Iowa as a last gasp. Even if successful in the short run, it won't have legs. Never does. The only time Iowa winner wins the nomination is when it's a fait accompli before Iowa like GWB. So you may be right. Newt may be going down (but I don't think so). Be careful what you wish for.
I am sure Michelle is a very nice person and is a very competent person as well.
But, with all due respect, you not only have to be competent, you also have to give off the impression that you are presidentially competent and not everybody who is competent is presidentially competent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.